惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
L
LangChain Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
I
InfoQ
腾讯CDC
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
H
Help Net Security
Y
Y Combinator Blog
B
Blog
博客园 - Franky
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
博客园 - 叶小钗
D
Docker
博客园 - 聂微东
B
Blog RSS Feed
G
Google Developers Blog

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Localization of real world regression Bugs using single e...
Dekel Cohen, Amiram Yehudai · 2015-05-06 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

Regression bugs occur whenever software functionality that previously worked as desired stops working, or no longer works as expected. Code changes, such as bug fixes or new feature work, may result in a regression bug. Regression bugs are an annoying and painful phenomena in the software development process, requiring a great deal of effort to localize, effectively hindering team progress. In this paper we present Regression Detective, a method which assists the developer locating source code segments that caused a given regression bug. Unlike some of the existing tools, our approach doesn't require an automated test suite or executing past versions of the system. It is highly scalable to millions of loc systems. The developer, who has no prior knowledge of the code or the bug, reproduces the bug according to the steps described in the bug database. We evaluated our approach with bugs from leading open source projects (Eclipse, Tomcat, Ant). In over 90% of the cases, the developer only has to examine 10-20 lines of code in order to locate the bug, regardless of the code base size.