惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 【当耐特】
量子位
C
Check Point Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
美团技术团队
The Cloudflare Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
月光博客
月光博客
V
V2EX
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
IT之家
IT之家
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Generalized Wake-Up: Amortized Shared Memory Lower Bounds...
Siddhartha Visveswara Jayanti · 2022-07-13 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

In this work, we define the generalized wake-up problem, $GWU(s)$, for a shared memory asynchronous system with $n$ processes. Informally, the problem, which is parametrized by an increasing sequence $s = s_1,\ldots,s_p$, asks that at least $n - i + 1$ processes identify that at least $s_i$ other processes have "woken up" and taken at least one step for each $1 \le i \le n$. We prove that any solution to $GWU(s)$ that uses read/write/compare-and-swap variables requires at least $Ω\left(\sum_{i = 1}^n \log s_i \right)$ steps to solve. The generalized wake-up lower bound serves as a technique for proving lower bounds on the amortized complexities of operations on many linearizable concurrent data types through reductions. We illustrate this with several examples: (1) We show an $Ω(\log n)$ amortized lower bound on the complexity of implementing counters and {\em fetch-and-increment} objects which match the complexities of the algorithms given by Jayanti and Ellen & Woelfel; the lower bound even extends to a significantly relaxed version of the object. (2) We show an $Ω(\log n)$ amortized lower bound on the complexity of the pop, dequeue, and deleteMin operations of a concurrent stack, queue, and priority queue respectively that hold even if the data type definitions are significantly relaxed; (3) In another paper, we have shown an $Ω(\log\log(n \ell/m))$ amortized lower bound on the complexity of operations on a union-find object of size $\ell$ (when $m$ operations are performed).