惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
A
About on SuperTechFans
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
IT之家
IT之家
罗磊的独立博客
博客园_首页
月光博客
月光博客
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
量子位
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
H
Help Net Security
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
B
Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
V
V2EX
Vercel News
Vercel News
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Quasi-Optimal Leader Election Algorithms in Radio Network...
2006-07-08 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

A radio network (RN) is a distributed system consisting of $n$ radio stations. We design and analyze two distributed leader election protocols in RN where the number $n$ of radio stations is unknown. The first algorithm runs under the assumption of {\it limited collision detection}, while the second assumes that {\it no collision detection} is available. By ``limited collision detection'', we mean that if exactly one station sends (broadcasts) a message, then all stations (including the transmitter) that are listening at this moment receive the sent message. By contrast, the second no-collision-detection algorithm assumes that a station cannot simultaneously send and listen signals. Moreover, both protocols allow the stations to keep asleep as long as possible, thus minimizing their awake time slots (such algorithms are called {\it energy-efficient}). Both randomized protocols in RN areshown to elect a leader in $O(\log{(n)})$ expected time, with no station being awake for more than $O(\log{\log{(n)}})$ time slots. Therefore, a new class of efficient algorithms is set up that match the $Ω(\log{(n)})$ time lower-bound established by Kushilevitz and Mansour.