惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - 【当耐特】
GbyAI
GbyAI
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
罗磊的独立博客
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
腾讯CDC
F
Fortinet All Blogs
IT之家
IT之家
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Jina AI
Jina AI
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
D
DataBreaches.Net
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
H
Help Net Security
V
Visual Studio Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Y
Y Combinator Blog

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Reconfigurable Broadcast Networks and Asynchronous Shared...
A. R. Balasubramanian, Chana Weil-Kennedy · 2021-08-17 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

We show the equivalence of two distributed computing models, namely reconfigurable broadcast networks (RBN) and asynchronous shared-memory systems (ASMS), that were introduced independently. Both RBN and ASMS are systems in which a collection of anonymous, finite-state processes run the same protocol. In RBN, the processes communicate by selective broadcast: a process can broadcast a message which is received by all of its neighbors, and the set of neighbors of a process can change arbitrarily over time. In ASMS, the processes communicate by shared memory: a process can either write to or read from a shared register. Our main result is that RBN and ASMS can simulate each other, i.e. they are equivalent with respect to parameterized reachability, where we are given two (possibly infinite) sets of configurations C and C' defined by upper and lower bounds on the number of processes in each state and we would like to decide if some configuration in C can reach some configuration in C'. Using this simulation equivalence, we transfer results of RBN to ASMS and vice versa. Finally, we show that RBN and ASMS can simulate a third distributed model called immediate observation (IO) nets. Moreover, for a slightly stronger notion of simulation (which is satisfied by all the simulations given in this paper), we show that IO nets cannot simulate RBN.