Recent improvements in energy efficiency and renewable energy integration have increased the relative importance of embodied carbon in data centers, motivating improved provisioning strategies. Conventional approaches primarily minimize operational energy, but this perspective is increasingly insufficient for sustainability. In this paper, we propose carbon depreciation models to encourage longer hardware lifetimes. Carbon depreciation assigns a larger portion of embodied carbon to newly provisioned servers, discouraging unnecessary deployment of new hardware. As a result, new servers are provisioned mainly for jobs with strict quality-of-service (QoS) constraints, while older servers, whose embodied carbon has largely been recovered, are used for other workloads. We further argue that both embodied carbon and operational carbon from server idle time should be recovered during active jobs, encouraging provisioning strategies that maintain high utilization. We show that prior carbon accounting strategies can be counterproductive: under a greedy scheduler minimizing carbon under QoS constraints, jobs are priced as 25% cheaper on new hardware than on older hardware. In contrast, our approach uses a greedy scheduler that prioritizes older hardware through non-linear carbon depreciation, promoting sustainable provisioning. Experimental results show carbon reductions of 28-57%, depending on server lifetime assumptions.