惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

小众软件
小众软件
B
Blog RSS Feed
美团技术团队
博客园 - 【当耐特】
C
Check Point Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
J
Java Code Geeks
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
D
DataBreaches.Net
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Vercel News
Vercel News
P
Proofpoint News Feed
IT之家
IT之家
I
InfoQ
腾讯CDC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Byzantine Geoconsensus
Joseph Oglio, Kendric Hood, Gokarna Sharma, Mikhail Nesterenko · 2020-10-06 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

We define and investigate the consensus problem for a set of $N$ processes embedded on the $d$-dimensional plane, $d\geq 2$, which we call the {\em geoconsensus} problem. The processes have unique coordinates and can communicate with each other through oral messages. In contrast to the literature where processes are individually considered Byzantine, it is considered that all processes covered by a finite-size convex fault area $F$ are Byzantine and there may be one or more processes in a fault area. Similarly as in the literature where correct processes do not know which processes are Byzantine, it is assumed that the fault area location is not known to the correct processes. We prove that the geoconsensus is impossible if all processes may be covered by at most three areas where one is a fault area. Considering the 2-dimensional embedding, on the constructive side, for $M \geq 1$ fault areas $F$ of arbitrary shape with diameter $D$, we present a consensus algorithm that tolerates $f\leq N-(2M+1)$ Byzantine processes provided that there are $9M+3$ processes with pairwise distance between them greater than $D$. For square $F$ with side $\ell$, we provide a consensus algorithm that lifts this pairwise distance requirement and tolerates $f\leq N-15M$ Byzantine processes given that all processes are covered by at least $22M$ axis aligned squares of the same size as $F$. For a circular $F$ of diameter $\ell$, this algorithm tolerates $f\leq N-57M$ Byzantine processes if all processes are covered by at least $85M$ circles. We then extend these results to various size combinations of fault and non-fault areas as well as $d$-dimensional process embeddings, $d\geq 3$.