惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
月光博客
月光博客
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
F
Fortinet All Blogs
小众软件
小众软件
D
Docker
U
Unit 42
博客园 - 聂微东
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
爱范儿
爱范儿
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
博客园 - 司徒正美
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
腾讯CDC

cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Block-Sphere Vector Quantization GroupAffect-4: A Multimodal Dataset of Four-Person Collaborative Interaction CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing TextAlign: Preference Alignment for Text Rendering with Hierarchical Rewards LogRouter: Adaptive Two-Level LLM Routing for Log Question Answering in Big Data Systems Agentic Cost-Aware Query Planning with Knowledge Distillation for Big Data Analytics Covariance Structure and Coordinate Heterogeneity Govern Binary Quantization of Contrastive Embeddings IVF-TQ: Calibration-Free Streaming Vector Search via a Codebook-Free Residual Layer Automatic Unsupervised Ensemble Outlier Model Selection--Extended Version A Generative AI Framework for Intelligent Utility Billing CO 2 Analytics and Sustainable Resource Optimisation Towards Foundation Models for Relational Databases with Language Models and Graph Neural Networks Gaussian Relational Graph Transformer Croissant Baker: Metadata Generation for Discoverable, Governable, and Reusable ML Datasets Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Stage-wise Preference Optimization under Distribution Shift A Horn extension of DL-Lite with NL data complexity 3D Primitives are a Spatial Language for VLMs Enabling AI-Native Mobility in 6G: A Real-World Dataset for Handover, Beam Management, and Timing Advance A CAP-like Trilemma for Large Language Models: Correctness, Non-bias, and Utility under Semantic Underdetermination EpiCastBench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Multivariate Epidemic Forecasting FERMI: Exploiting Relations for Membership Inference Against Tabular Diffusion Models Toward Multi-Database Query Reasoning for Text2Cypher Autonomous FAIR Digital Objects: From Passive Assertions to Active Knowledge HOME-KGQA: A Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Question Answering on Household Daily Activities Detect, Localize, and Explain: Interactive Hierarchical Log Anomaly Analytics with LLM Augmentation Open Ontologies: Tool-Augmented Ontology Engineering with Stable Matching Alignment Machine Learning-Based Pre-Test Risk Stratification for PCR-Confirmed Chlamydia Using Patient-Reported Data and Urine Biomarkers Reconciling Consistency-Based Diagnosis with Actual-Causality-Based Explanations PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation? Anatomy of a Query: W5H Dimensions and FAR Patterns for Text-to-SQL Evaluation Building informative materials datasets beyond targeted objectives
Universally Utility-Maximizing Privacy Mechanisms
Arpita Ghosh, Tim Roughgarden, Mukund Sundararajan · 2008-11-18 · via cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

A mechanism for releasing information about a statistical database with sensitive data must resolve a trade-off between utility and privacy. Privacy can be rigorously quantified using the framework of {\em differential privacy}, which requires that a mechanism's output distribution is nearly the same whether or not a given database row is included or excluded. The goal of this paper is strong and general utility guarantees, subject to differential privacy. We pursue mechanisms that guarantee near-optimal utility to every potential user, independent of its side information (modeled as a prior distribution over query results) and preferences (modeled via a loss function). Our main result is: for each fixed count query and differential privacy level, there is a {\em geometric mechanism} $M^*$ -- a discrete variant of the simple and well-studied Laplace mechanism -- that is {\em simultaneously expected loss-minimizing} for every possible user, subject to the differential privacy constraint. This is an extremely strong utility guarantee: {\em every} potential user $u$, no matter what its side information and preferences, derives as much utility from $M^*$ as from interacting with a differentially private mechanism $M_u$ that is optimally tailored to $u$.