惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

雷峰网
雷峰网
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园_首页
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
D
Docker
J
Java Code Geeks
B
Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 聂微东
罗磊的独立博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
IT之家
IT之家
量子位
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
美团技术团队
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
腾讯CDC
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
V
Visual Studio Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
C
Check Point Blog

cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Block-Sphere Vector Quantization GroupAffect-4: A Multimodal Dataset of Four-Person Collaborative Interaction CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing TextAlign: Preference Alignment for Text Rendering with Hierarchical Rewards LogRouter: Adaptive Two-Level LLM Routing for Log Question Answering in Big Data Systems Agentic Cost-Aware Query Planning with Knowledge Distillation for Big Data Analytics Covariance Structure and Coordinate Heterogeneity Govern Binary Quantization of Contrastive Embeddings IVF-TQ: Calibration-Free Streaming Vector Search via a Codebook-Free Residual Layer Automatic Unsupervised Ensemble Outlier Model Selection--Extended Version A Generative AI Framework for Intelligent Utility Billing CO 2 Analytics and Sustainable Resource Optimisation Towards Foundation Models for Relational Databases with Language Models and Graph Neural Networks Gaussian Relational Graph Transformer Croissant Baker: Metadata Generation for Discoverable, Governable, and Reusable ML Datasets Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Stage-wise Preference Optimization under Distribution Shift A Horn extension of DL-Lite with NL data complexity 3D Primitives are a Spatial Language for VLMs Enabling AI-Native Mobility in 6G: A Real-World Dataset for Handover, Beam Management, and Timing Advance A CAP-like Trilemma for Large Language Models: Correctness, Non-bias, and Utility under Semantic Underdetermination EpiCastBench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Multivariate Epidemic Forecasting FERMI: Exploiting Relations for Membership Inference Against Tabular Diffusion Models Toward Multi-Database Query Reasoning for Text2Cypher Autonomous FAIR Digital Objects: From Passive Assertions to Active Knowledge HOME-KGQA: A Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Question Answering on Household Daily Activities Detect, Localize, and Explain: Interactive Hierarchical Log Anomaly Analytics with LLM Augmentation Open Ontologies: Tool-Augmented Ontology Engineering with Stable Matching Alignment Machine Learning-Based Pre-Test Risk Stratification for PCR-Confirmed Chlamydia Using Patient-Reported Data and Urine Biomarkers Reconciling Consistency-Based Diagnosis with Actual-Causality-Based Explanations PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation? Anatomy of a Query: W5H Dimensions and FAR Patterns for Text-to-SQL Evaluation Building informative materials datasets beyond targeted objectives
Optimization of stochastic database cracking
Meenesh Bhardwaj · 2013-05-08 · via cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Variant Stochastic cracking is a significantly more resilient approach to adaptive indexing. It showed [1]that Stochastic cracking uses each query as a hint on how to reorganize data, but not blindly so; it gains resilience and avoids performance bottlenecks by deliberately applying certain arbitrary choices in its decision making. Therefore bring, adaptive indexing forward to a mature formulation that confers the workload-robustness that previous approaches lacked. Original cracking relies on the randomness of the workloads to converge well. [2][3] However, where the workload is non-random, cracking needs to introduce randomness on its own. Stochastic Cracking clearly improves over original cracking by being robust in workload changes while maintaining all original cracking features when it comes to adaptation. But looking at both types of cracking, it conveyed an incomplete picture as at some point of time it is must to know whether the workload is random or sequential. In this paper our focus is on optimization of variant stochastic cracking, that could be achieved in two ways either by reducing the initialization cost to make stochastic cracking even more transparent to the user, especially for queries that initiate a workload change and hence incur a higher cost or by combining the strengths of the various stochastic cracking algorithms via a dynamic component that decides which algorithm to choose for a query on the fly. The efforts have been put in to make an algorithm that reduces the initialization cost by using the main notion of both cracking, while considering the requirements of adaptive indexing [2].