惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
L
LangChain Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
小众软件
小众软件
量子位
月光博客
月光博客
P
Proofpoint News Feed
IT之家
IT之家
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 司徒正美
雷峰网
雷峰网
V
Visual Studio Blog

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
Proof of Cloud: Data Center Execution Assurance for Confi...
Filip Rezabek, Moe Mahhouk, Andrew Miller, Quintus Kilbourn, Geo · 2025-10-14 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Confidential Virtual Machines (CVMs) protect data in use by running workloads within hardware-enforced Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). However, existing CVM attestation mechanisms only certify what code is running, not where it is running. Commercial TEEs mitigate passive physical attacks through memory encryption but explicitly exclude active hardware tampering (memory interposers, physical side channels, ...). Yet current attestations provide no cryptographic evidence that a CVM executes on hardware residing within a trusted data center where such attacks would not take place. This gap enables proxy attacks in which valid attestations are combined across machines to falsely attest trusted execution. To bridge this gap, we introduce Data Center Execution Assurance (DCEA), a design that generates a cryptographic Proof of Cloud by binding CVM attestation to platform-level Trusted Platform Module (TPM) evidence. DCEA combines two independent roots of trust. First, the TEE manufacturer, and second, the infrastructure provider, by cross-linking runtime TEE measurements with the vTPM-measured boot CVM state. This binding ensures that CVM execution, vTPM quotes, and platform provenance all originate from the same physical chassis. We formalize the environment's provenance and show that DCEA prevents advanced relay attacks, including a novel mix-and-match proxy attack. Using the AGATE framework in the Universal Composability model, we prove that DCEA emulates an ideal location-aware TEE even under a malicious host software stack. We implement DCEA on Google Cloud bare-metal Intel TDX instances using Intel TXT and evaluate its performance, demonstrating practical overheads and deployability. DCEA refines the CVM threat model and enables verifiable execution-location guarantees for privacy-sensitive workloads.