惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

C
Check Point Blog
美团技术团队
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 叶小钗
J
Java Code Geeks
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - Franky
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
小众软件
小众软件
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Vercel News
Vercel News
Y
Y Combinator Blog
量子位

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
Polar Coding and Linear Decoding
Geraldo A. Barbosa · 2025-07-26 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Polar encoding, described by Arikan in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 55, No. 7, July 2009, was a milestone for telecommunications. A Polar code distributes information among high and low-capacity channels, showing the possibility of achieving perfect channel capacity. The high-capacity channels allow almost noiseless transmission of data. When these channels are not high noise, reliability is achieved in the signal transmission. It starts to compete against codes such a Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes. Polar code can be also considered error correcting, based on the redundancy inherent in its structure. This feature makes polar encoding also applicable to digital quantum-resistant cryptography protocols. This work explores linear decoding at a first or single trial in the case of small losses or small number of bit-flipping, and repeated transmission for medium level losses. This is distinct from Arikans successive probabilistic decoding by application of probabilistic rules. Linear decoding is done directly from solving the linear equations connecting the codewords x and the received signals y after transmission via noisy channels. Numerical examples will be shown. Along with this work, programming in Mathematica language was used. Codes are available for copy-and-paste for Mathematica users to immediately try the described formalism.