惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
量子位
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
J
Java Code Geeks
V
V2EX
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
D
DataBreaches.Net
博客园 - Franky
爱范儿
爱范儿
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
博客园_首页
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - 司徒正美
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Deprecating a React component using TypeScript Overload
Matti Bar-Zeev · 2026-05-30 · via DEV Community

A disclaimer -
Please be advised that the solution presented in this article addresses a very specific problem/situation, and it is not the recommended way to support component versions within a project.

Situation? What situation?

Say that you have a monorepo and in this monorepo you have a package which contains the common components the different repos use. All consumers are using “workspace:^” for this package and since the component package is not published to a registry the publish-time resolution is irrelevant, and workspace:^ simply means every package in the monorepo that depends on it always gets the current local implementation — live, not pinned to a registry snapshot.
But what happens when you would like to introduce a breaking change to a component, say change the Card component’s border radius, title bg color and shadow? This means that all consumers can potentially break, right?
So some might say to maybe create a new component and mark the old one as deprecated, but this would mean that all consumers will need to change the component name they are using and it also means that you will now have 2 different component, residing in 2 different dirs (if you are well organized) and it creates even more “noise”.

I wanted something simpler and more sustainable. My goals are:

  • Keep the same component name
  • Be able to see what is deprecated
  • Have an easy way to switch between the old and the new

Here is one way, I came up with, of doing that

TypeScript, among other languages like Java, has a really neat concept of Overloading. Overloading means you can have the same name for, say, a function but if you call it with different arguments you get a different implementation, and we all know that React components are basically functions, right? great.

Say I have a very simple Card component:

import React from 'react';
import './index.scss';


export interface CardProps {
   title: string;
   content: string;
   style?: React.CSSProperties;
}


const Card = ({title, content, style}: CardProps) => {
   return (
       <div className="card" style={style}>
           <div className="card-header">
               <span className="card-title">{title}</span>
           </div>
           <div className="card-content">{content}</div>
       </div>
   );
};


export default Card;

And it looks like this:

But I would like to create a newer version of the Card component, which has different border radius, title bg color and shadow, and mark the old version as deprecated.
I can create an Overload for the Card function. Let’s see how:

I first created a new interface for the new card props. In it I have a single prop called “new” which is always true, and we will later see how we use it.
(you can go even further and have v1 if you plan to support more than a single version, but please don’t do that - this does not come to replace package versioning)

export interface NewCardProps extends CardProps {
   new: true;
}

Next we call the old Card function “LegacyCard” and the new version “NewCard”. In the NewCard we do all the breaking changes we wanted.

function LegacyCard({title, content, style}: CardProps): React.JSX.Element {
   return (
       <div className="card" style={style}>
           <div className="card-header">
               <span className="card-title">{title}</span>
           </div>
           <div className="card-content">{content}</div>
       </div>
   );
}


const NewCard = ({title, content, style}: CardProps) => {
   return (
       <div className="card card-new" style={style}>
           <div className="card-header">
               <span className="card-title">{title}</span>
           </div>
           <div className="card-content">{content}</div>
       </div>
   );
};

Now to the interesting part - the Overloading:
See how we have 3 Card function definitions, one for the old, one for the new and one for the Overloading. Also notice that the one with the old CardProps is marked as @deprecated

/* eslint-disable no-redeclare */
/** @deprecated Use Card with "new" prop on it instead */
function Card(props: CardProps): React.JSX.Element;
function Card(props: NewCardProps): React.JSX.Element;


function Card(props: CardProps | NewCardProps): React.JSX.Element {
   if ('new' in props) {
       return NewCard(props);
   }
   return LegacyCard(props);
}

And eventually we’re still exporting a single Card:

export default Card;

That’s it - we are ready to start using it. Let’s see how the Card Storybook implementation looks like. Notice that one Card has a strikethrough while the other one is fine. The reason is, that the other Card component has an additional prop to it - “new”

And here is how it looks like:

That’s it, we’re done :)

For the sake of AI, I’ve also created a small SKILL that can do that for you. You can tweak it to fit your needs. You can find it here: deprecate-react-component skill

Cheers