惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
F
Fortinet All Blogs
D
Docker
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
罗磊的独立博客
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
J
Java Code Geeks
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
U
Unit 42
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
V
V2EX
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
P
Proofpoint News Feed
G
Google Developers Blog
H
Help Net Security

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
I Built An API Security Scanner That Won't Shoot You in t...
Cory Sorel · 2026-06-23 · via DEV Community

Four years into a career focused on APIs and developer tooling, I kept running into the same gap: security scanning options were either too heavy (stand up a platform, configure a workspace, wait for results) or too risky to run in CI without careful guardrails. I wanted a lightweight, CLI-first tool that gave a clear first pass without the danger of destructive side effects.

That's Sentinel: a spec-aware API security scanner built for developers and CI pipelines. Out of the box it sends only GETs, keeps burst probes conservative, and requires an explicit opt-in, plus an OpenAPI spec, before it touches anything injection-related. Safety isn't a feature, it's the default.

Here's how that show's up in the implementation:

Architecture

Spec first endpoint selection

When an OpenAPI spec is provided, Sentinel resolves the full set of endpoints to test once, before any suite runs, and passes them down via ctx.selectedEndpoints. Suites call resolveEndpoints(ctx.selectedEndpoints) to get that list, it's never re-computed. The spec's servers[0].url base path is extracted and normalized into every endpoint path at selection time, so suites never have to think about it.

The fallback is deliberate too: no spec, no scope config, or filters that exclude everything all collapse to GET /. Suites will always get a valid list.

Finding metadata as a manifest

In the headers suite, finding definitions live in a static REQUIRED_HEADERS array: each entry carries the finding ID, title, severity, description, remediation, and OWASP reference. The detection logic is a separate loop that iterates that manifest and checks for each header. Adding a new required header check means adding one entry to the array; there's no detection logic to write.

This pattern keeps two concerns from drifting apart over time: what a finding is versus what triggers it.

Errors aren't findings

RunResult has three distinct fields: findings, suiteErrors, and reporterErrors. That separation is enforced at the type level: suiteErrors and reporterErrors are required fields, not optional. TypeScript won't let you construct a RunResult without accounting for both. The intent is that if a suite throws unexpectedly mid-scan, that failure surfaces in its own field with its own exit code (1) rather than being folded into security findings or silently dropped.

A finding has severity, remediation, affected endpoints, evidence. An operational error has none of that. Conflating them would make the output untrustworthy in exactly the situation where you need to trust it most: when something goes wrong.

Targeted Testing

During the process of building Sentinel I discovered I needed a way to guarantee findings. I built Anemone: a small, configurable, vulnerable API that became a permanent part of Sentinel's testing story. It hosts a series of endpoints designed to trigger at least one finding from every suite:

  • Headers: security headers absent by default; triggers missing_hsts, missing_xcto, missing_referrer_policy
  • CORS: reflects arbitrary origins with credentials by default; a second mode tests wildcard + credentials
  • Auth: /api/v2/auth returns a JWT with alg:none, a ~27h TTL, and no enforcement on protected routes
  • Inventory: /debug, /swagger, /openapi.json, and /graphql all exposed; /api/v1/ still responds alongside the declared v2 spec
  • Injection: /api/v2/search reflects SQL errors on quote characters; /api/v2/greet evaluates {{expr}} in query params

Each misconfiguration is individually toggleable via env var, so you can fix one issue, re-run Sentinel, and verify that specific finding disappears. It's a useful sanity check when writing new suites.

Moving Anemone from a testing fixture to a publicly hosted API required some thought, especially around the injection suite. The {{7*7}} → 49 behavior that triggers Sentinel's template injection probe had to work without enabling real RCE. safeEval() handles this: a hand-rolled arithmetic evaluator that resolves simple expressions and returns a fake TemplateError for anything else. No eval(), no execution.

Running a demo

You can see Sentinel in action in under a minute from your command line:

npm install -g @uncommon-carp/sentinel

Then point it at Anemone:

sentinel scan -u https://target.barbel.dev

Sentinel outputs both a human readable Markdown doc and machine readable JSON. Here's a sample from hitting Anemone:

# Sentinel Report

- **Target:** `https://target.barbel.dev`
- **Scanned:** 2026-06-22T08:48:39.931Z
- **Finished:** 2026-06-22T08:48:44.344Z
- **Duration:** 4413ms
- **Version:** 0.3.1

## Summary

| Severity | Count |
| --- | --- |
| Critical | 2 |
| Medium | 10 |
| Low | 6 |
| **Total** | **18** |

## OWASP Coverage

| Category | Findings |
| --- | --- |
| API2: Broken Authentication | 5 |
| API4: Unrestricted Resource Consumption | 2 |
| API8: Security Misconfiguration | 8 |
| API9: Improper Inventory Management | 3 |

## Findings

---

### [Critical] JWT with alg:none detected in response
`auth.jwt_alg_none` | Suite: auth | API2: Broken Authentication

A JWT using the "none" algorithm was found in a response. Tokens with alg:none carry no cryptographic signature; servers that accept them can be trivially bypassed.

> **Why it matters:** An attacker can forge arbitrary JWT claims — including elevated roles — and gain unauthorized access to any endpoint that trusts the token, with no cryptographic barrier.

**Remediation:** Reject JWTs with alg:none server-side and enforce an explicit algorithm allowlist.

---

### [Medium] Missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
`headers.missing_hsts` | Suite: headers | API8: Security Misconfiguration

HSTS helps enforce HTTPS by telling browsers to only connect over TLS for a period of time.

> **Why it matters:** Without HSTS, browsers may connect over plain HTTP on subsequent visits, enabling downgrade attacks that allow credential and session token interception on the local network.

**Remediation:** Add a Strict-Transport-Security header on HTTPS responses (e.g. max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains).

{
  "meta": {
    "startedAt": "2026-06-22T08:45:30.542Z",
    "targetBaseUrl": "https://target.barbel.dev",
    "version": "0.3.1",
    "finishedAt": "2026-06-22T08:45:35.978Z",
    "durationMs": 5433
  },
  "config": {
    "target": {
      "baseUrl": "https://target.barbel.dev",
      "openapi": "http://target.barbel.dev/openapi.json"
    },
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "headers.missing_hsts",
      "title": "Missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)",
      "severity": "medium",
      "description": "HSTS helps enforce HTTPS by telling browsers to only connect over TLS for a period of time.",
      "whyItMatters": "Without HSTS, browsers may connect over plain HTTP on subsequent visits, enabling downgrade attacks that allow credential and session token interception on the local network.",
      "remediation": "Add a Strict-Transport-Security header on HTTPS responses (e.g. max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains).",
      "owasp": "API8: Security Misconfiguration",
      "suite": "headers",
      "tags": [
        "headers",
        "http"
      ],
      "evidence": {
        "header": "strict-transport-security",
        "count": 5,
        "probed": 5,
        "affected": [
          {
            "method": "get",
            "path": "/api/v2/auth",
            "url": "https://target.barbel.dev/api/v2/auth",
            "status": 200
          },
          {
            "method": "get",
            "path": "/api/v2/greet",
            "url": "https://target.barbel.dev/api/v2/greet",
            "status": 200
          },
          {
            "method": "get",
            "path": "/api/v2/users",
            "url": "https://target.barbel.dev/api/v2/users",
            "status": 200
          },
          {
            "method": "get",
            "path": "/api/v2/health",
            "url": "https://target.barbel.dev/api/v2/health",
            "status": 200
          },
          {
            "method": "get",
            "path": "/api/v2/search",
            "url": "https://target.barbel.dev/api/v2/search",
            "status": 200
          }
        ]
      }
    },
  ]
}

What's Next

Next up: Anemone will be expanded with richer auth and rate limiting scenarios, there's deduplication work to be done for findings, and the injection suite is ready for deeper SSRF/Interactsh exploration.

All it takes to get started is npx @uncommon-carp/sentinel scan --url <your-api>. Stars and issues are welcome on GitHub: bug reports, false positives, or suite ideas especially.