惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

B
Blog RSS Feed
量子位
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
美团技术团队
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
H
Help Net Security
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
博客园 - Franky
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
U
Unit 42
J
Java Code Geeks
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
IT之家
IT之家
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
L
LangChain Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31% accuracy actuall...
Akhilesh · 2026-05-16 · via DEV Community
Cover image for I evaluated my self-trained LLM what 31% accuracy actually means

Akhilesh

Most AI projects don't include evaluation. They show a nice demo, pick cherry-picked examples, and call it done. I wanted to be honest, so I tested my model on 200 questions it had never seen.

How I evaluated

The test set has 1,273 questions that were never used in training. I tested on 200 of them:

for question in test_questions[:200]:
    # Show model the question + 4 options
    # Ask it to pick A, B, C, or D
    prediction = model.predict(question)

    # Check against correct answer
    if prediction == correct_answer:
        correct += 1

accuracy = correct / 200

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The results

Total questions: 200
Correct:         62
Accuracy:        31.0%
Random baseline: 25.0%

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

My model beats random guessing by 6 percentage points. That's 31% vs 25%.

Is 31% good?

Depends on what you're comparing to.

Compared to random guessing on 4-option MCQs — yes. The model genuinely learned something. It's not just flipping coins.

Compared to GPT-4 on the same benchmark — no. GPT-4 scores around 90%. But GPT-4 has roughly 1000x more parameters and was trained on vastly more data for months on expensive hardware.

For a 1.3 billion parameter model trained for 1.5 hours on a free GPU — 31% is a real result.

What I would do differently

Three things would improve this significantly:

  1. Larger base model — Mistral 7B or LLaMA 3 8B would likely score 50-60%+ on the same benchmark with the same training data. Size matters for reasoning.

  2. Better RAG knowledge base — I stored MCQ training text as knowledge chunks. Clean medical facts from PubMed or clinical guidelines would give the retriever much better material to work with.

  3. Re-ranking — After retrieving top 3 results, a cross-encoder model could re-rank them by true relevance before injecting into the prompt.

Why I'm sharing the real numbers

Because honest numbers are more valuable than fake demos. Any recruiter or engineer who looks at this project can see exactly what was built, how it was tested, and where the limitations are.

The architecture is production-ready. Swap in a 7B model and the retrieval pipeline, API, and UI don't change at all. That's what good engineering looks like.

Full project: github.com/YadavAkhileshh/medmind
Model: huggingface.co/Yakhilesh/medmind-opt-medical