惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - Franky
U
Unit 42
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
B
Blog RSS Feed
雷峰网
雷峰网
D
DataBreaches.Net
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
I
InfoQ
美团技术团队
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
G
Google Developers Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
月光博客
月光博客
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Making LLM Calls Reliable: Retry, Semaphore, Cache, and B...
Oscar Rieken · 2026-05-24 · via DEV Community

When TestSmith generates tests with --llm, it calls an LLM for every public member of every source file being processed. A project with 20 files and 5 public functions each means up to 100 API calls in a single run. That's a lot of surface area for things to go wrong.

Here's the reliability stack we built, layer by layer.

Layer 1: Retry with Exponential Backoff

LLM APIs fail transiently. Rate limits, timeouts, occasional 5xx responses — all of these are recoverable if you wait and retry. We built a retry middleware that wraps any Provider:

type RetryProvider struct {
    inner      Provider
    maxRetries int
}

func (r *RetryProvider) Complete(ctx context.Context, req CompletionRequest) (CompletionResponse, error) {
    var lastErr error
    for attempt := 0; attempt < r.maxRetries; attempt++ {
        if attempt > 0 {
            wait := time.Duration(math.Pow(2, float64(attempt))) * 100 * time.Millisecond
            select {
            case <-time.After(wait):
            case <-ctx.Done():
                return CompletionResponse{}, ctx.Err()
            }
        }
        resp, err := r.inner.Complete(ctx, req)
        if err == nil {
            return resp, nil
        }
        lastErr = err
    }
    return CompletionResponse{}, fmt.Errorf("after %d attempts: %w", r.maxRetries, lastErr)
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

MaxRetryAttempts defaults to 3. With exponential backoff: attempt 1 is immediate, attempt 2 waits 200ms, attempt 3 waits 400ms. Total worst-case wait per call is under a second — acceptable latency for a background tool.

Layer 2: Semaphore for Concurrency Control

With up to 100 calls to make, goroutine fan-out is the obvious approach. But hitting an LLM API with 100 concurrent requests triggers rate limiting immediately. A semaphore caps the in-flight calls:

type SemaphoreProvider struct {
    inner Provider
    sem   chan struct{}
}

func NewSemaphoreProvider(inner Provider, maxConcurrent int) *SemaphoreProvider {
    return &SemaphoreProvider{inner: inner, sem: make(chan struct{}, maxConcurrent)}
}

func (s *SemaphoreProvider) Complete(ctx context.Context, req CompletionRequest) (CompletionResponse, error) {
    select {
    case s.sem <- struct{}{}:
        defer func() { <-s.sem }()
    case <-ctx.Done():
        return CompletionResponse{}, ctx.Err()
    }
    return s.inner.Complete(ctx, req)
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

MaxConcurrentCalls defaults to 5. Each retry attempt acquires its own semaphore slot — this is important. If retry logic held a slot while waiting between attempts, other goroutines would be blocked unnecessarily. The retry wrapper is the outer layer; semaphore is the inner layer.

The middleware stack assembled by the factory:

retry → semaphore → raw provider

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Layer 3: Result Cache

Many test generation runs touch the same files repeatedly — watch mode is the extreme case. Calling the LLM for the same source code twice is wasteful. A content-addressed cache avoids it:

type ResultCache struct {
    mu      sync.RWMutex
    entries map[string][]BodyGenResult
    hits    int
    misses  int
}

func cacheKey(req BodyGenRequest) string {
    h := sha256.New()
    fmt.Fprintf(h, "%s\n%s\n%s\n%s", req.Language, req.MemberName, req.SourceCode, req.Framework.Name)
    return hex.EncodeToString(h[:])
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The key is a SHA-256 hash of the language, member name, source code, and framework. If the source file changes, the hash changes and the cache misses — you always get fresh results for changed code.

After a run, --verbose prints the cache stats:

LLM cache — hits: 12  misses: 8  entries: 8

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Layer 4: Batch Generation

The fan-out approach makes one API call per public member. For a file with 10 functions, that's 10 calls. Batch generation collapses this to one:

func (g *LLMBodyGenerator) GenerateBatchBodies(
    ctx context.Context,
    reqs []BodyGenRequest,
) ([]BodyGenResult, error) {
    prompt := buildBatchPrompt(reqs)
    resp, err := g.provider.Complete(ctx, CompletionRequest{
        SystemPrompt:   batchSystemPrompt,
        UserPrompt:     prompt,
        Model:          g.model,
        MaxTokens:      g.maxTokens * len(reqs), // scale with request count
        Temperature:    g.temperature,
        ResponseFormat: "json_object",            // structured output
    })
    // ...
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

We use OpenAI's response_format: {"type": "json_object"} to get structured output. The model returns a JSON envelope with one entry per member:

{
  "tests": [
    {"name": "ProcessPayment", "code": "func TestProcessPayment(t *testing.T) { ... }"},
    {"name": "RefundPayment",  "code": "func TestRefundPayment(t *testing.T) { ... }"}
  ]
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

We parse that with a primary JSON parser, with a fallback to a delimiter-regex parser for providers that don't support structured output.

The pipeline checks for the BatchBodyGenerator interface via type assertion. If the generator implements it, batch mode is used. If not (or if the driver explicitly opts out), it falls back to goroutine fan-out with individual calls. This keeps the interface opt-in and backward compatible.

Observability: Cache Stats

With all this happening in the background, it's useful to know what actually ran. The cacheStatsReporter interface lets the CLI query stats without importing the llm package:

// In cmd/testsmith/generate.go — avoids importing internal/llm from the CLI layer
type cacheStatsReporter interface {
    CacheStats() (hits, misses, size int)
}

func printCacheStats(bg domain.BodyGenerator) {
    if !verbose {
        return
    }
    if r, ok := bg.(cacheStatsReporter); ok {
        hits, misses, size := r.CacheStats()
        fmt.Printf("LLM cache — hits: %d  misses: %d  entries: %d\n", hits, misses, size)
    }
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is the interface segregation principle at work: the CLI knows about domain.BodyGenerator (which it needs for the pipeline) and cacheStatsReporter (which it needs for stats output). It doesn't need to know anything else about the LLM implementation.

The Numbers

In practice, on a mid-size Go project with 40 source files and an average of 6 public functions each:

  • Without batch: 240 API calls, ~4 minutes at 5 concurrent
  • With batch: 40 API calls (one per file), ~45 seconds
  • Second run with warm cache: near-instant for unchanged files

The cache and batch generation together turn what would be a "go make coffee" operation into something you can run while you're still in the flow.

Next: how we structure context for both AI agents working on TestSmith itself and for the LLM generating tests for your project.