惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
V2EX
J
Java Code Geeks
月光博客
月光博客
博客园_首页
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - 聂微东
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
B
Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
The Cloudflare Blog
量子位
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - Franky
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 叶小钗

LWN.net comments

tcmalloc's weird hack [LWN.net] Fixed? [LWN.net] mpd [LWN.net] Userspace AX.25 [LWN.net] RIP [LWN.net] My two cents... [LWN.net] pipx [LWN.net] Tragedy [LWN.net] A young man destined for glory [LWN.net] And 'less' won't let you search [LWN.net] A great loss [LWN.net] Sad and shocking news [LWN.net] Easy migration from Clementine [LWN.net] Sad coincidence [LWN.net] GNOME is actually usable thanks to Seth et al [LWN.net] Sad news :( [LWN.net] armhf supports preempt_rt [LWN.net] MusicBrainz accurracy [LWN.net] On open source maintainership [LWN.net] Let's stop here [LWN.net] Not a new thing [LWN.net] uv is indeed great pgmoneta Some comments on this on a Postgres blog feed [LWN.net] uv [LWN.net] going to Debian [LWN.net] Upgrading 64-bit-capable systems to 64-bit kernels? [LWN.net] Free Software foundations Maintainers can wait for code review but not for publish review? A reasonably extreme point of view [LWN.net]
Surprising [LWN.net]
farnz · 2026-05-27 · via LWN.net comments

Surprising

Posted May 27, 2026 11:15 UTC (Wed) by farnz (subscriber, #17727)
In reply to: Surprising by SLi
Parent article: Comprehensive Response to Bambu's AGPLv3 Violations (Software Freedom Conservancy)

The additional restriction Bambu Labs appear to be trying to impose is that you cannot publish modified code that, in Bambu's sole opinion, makes it harder for them to control the use of their services, if that code is in any way derived from their AGPLv3 code releases.

They're doing this because it's impossible to distinguish an authorized client from an unauthorized one based solely on observing client behaviour - the overlap between "modified client, using our services in a way we dislike" and "unmodified client, using our services in a way we're content with" is huge, and if they blocked users for misuse of the cloud service in a way that caused them issues, they'd block a large number of customers using the Bambu Labs build of their official application.

So, they're attempting to say that it's not permissible to take the Bambu Labs AGPLv3 source code, and modify it in a way that doesn't also ensure that the client authorization code is modified, nor is it permissible to take the AGPLv3 client authorization code and integrate it with another project - you must not create derivative works of the AGPLv3 code where Bambu Labs deems it an unacceptable modification.