惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

罗磊的独立博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
小众软件
小众软件
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
美团技术团队
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
G
Google Developers Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
V
V2EX
量子位
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
A
About on SuperTechFans
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
C
Check Point Blog
月光博客
月光博客

Documentation - Proxmox Virtual Environment

Proxmox VE Admin Guide for 9.x Proxmox VE Admin Guide for 8.x Proxmox VE Admin Guide for 7.x Proxmox VE ZFS Benchmark 2020 Proxmox VE Ceph Benchmark 2020/09 Proxmox VE Ceph Benchmark 2018/02 Proxmox VE Datasheet
Proxmox VE Ceph Benchmark 2023/12
2023-12-11 · via Documentation - Proxmox Virtual Environment

Ceph Benchmark - Fast SSDs and network speeds in a Proxmox VE Ceph Reef cluster

Fast SSDs and network speeds in a Proxmox VE Ceph Reef cluster Current fast SSD disks provide great performance, and fast network cards are becoming more affordable. Hence, this is a good point to reevaluate how quickly different network setups for Ceph can be saturated depending on how many OSDs are present in each node.

Summary

In this paper we will present the following three key findings regarding hyper-converged Ceph setups with fast disks and high network bandwidth:

  • Our benchmarks show that a 10 Gbit/s network can be easily overwhelmed. Even when only using one very fast disk the network becomes a bottleneck quickly.
  • A network with a bandwidth of 25 Gbit/s can also become a bottleneck. Nevertheless, some improvements can be gained through configuration changes. Routing via FRR is preferred for a full-mesh cluster over Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP). If no fallback is needed, a simple routed setup may also be a (less resilient) option.
  • When using a 100 Gbit/s network the bottleneck in the cluster seems to finally shift away from the actual hardware and toward the Ceph client. Here we observed write speeds of up to 6000 MiB/s and read speeds of up to 7000 MiB/s for a single client. However, when using multiple clients in parallel, writing at up to 9800 MiB/s and reading at 19 500 MiB/s was possible.