惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

月光博客
月光博客
IT之家
IT之家
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 叶小钗
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
The Cloudflare Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
I
InfoQ
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
H
Help Net Security

math updates on arXiv.org

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization Non-normal spectral signatures of instability in neural network training dynamics Optimization of randomized neural networks for transfer operator approximation Selective Ambulance Dispatch Under Contextual Travel-Time Uncertainty LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics Neural Flow Operators can Approximate any Operator: Abstract Frameworks and Universal Approximations LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws On the Stability of Spherical Hellinger-Kantorovich Flows and Their Implications for Differential Privacy Training-Free Looped Transformers Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizer Entrywise Error Bounds for Spectral Ranking with Semi-Random Adversaries Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models? RA-DCA: A Randomized Active-Set DCA for Directional Stationarity in Max-Structured DC Programs Commutator-Induced Uncertainty in VAEs Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget Entropy Equivalence Testing Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation Any-Dimensional Invariant Universality Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization Diffusion-based Denoising Beats Vanilla Score Matching in Parameter Estimation: A Theoretical Explanation Resilience Characterization of AI-Native Wireless Receivers via Persistent Homology The General Theory of Localization Methods Group-Algebraic Tensors: Provably-optimal Equivariant Learning and Physical Symmetry Discovery General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions PilotWiMAE: Pilot-Native Representation Learning for Wireless Channels Proximal basin hopping: global optimization with guarantees
A Lean-Certified Proof of $K_8(4, 2) = 23$
Andreas Florath · 2026-06-15 · via math updates on arXiv.org

We prove the exact octonary covering-code value $K_8(4, 2) = 23$ in Lean 4. The upper bound is given by an explicit 23-word radius-two code in $(Fin\:8)^4$ , checked over all $8^4$ ambient words. The lower bound excludes covers with at most 22 words. A fiber-counting and missing-pair argument first rules out covers with at most 21 words. In the remaining 22-word case, the proof reduces a hypothetical cover to six missing-pair graphs coming from the coordinate-pair projections. Fiber-counting arguments constrain these graphs, and two Lean-checked Linear RAT (LRAT) refutations of stored conjunctive-normal-form (CNF) instances force a common 3 + 3 + 2 block structure. This structure is incompatible with a 22-word cover: the two three-symbol components already force 18 codewords, while the remaining two-symbol component would require a binary strength-two array of length four with at most four rows, which is impossible. The result is packaged as a proof-carrying Lean artifact: the explicit upper bound, structural lower bound, CNF instances, and LRAT refutations are checked inside Lean, with no external SAT solver used during proof replay.