惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园_首页
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
V
V2EX
小众软件
小众软件
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
量子位
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Jina AI
Jina AI
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
B
Blog RSS Feed
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
J
Java Code Geeks
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The Cloudflare Blog

math updates on arXiv.org

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization Non-normal spectral signatures of instability in neural network training dynamics Optimization of randomized neural networks for transfer operator approximation Selective Ambulance Dispatch Under Contextual Travel-Time Uncertainty LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics Neural Flow Operators can Approximate any Operator: Abstract Frameworks and Universal Approximations LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws On the Stability of Spherical Hellinger-Kantorovich Flows and Their Implications for Differential Privacy Training-Free Looped Transformers Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizer Entrywise Error Bounds for Spectral Ranking with Semi-Random Adversaries Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models? RA-DCA: A Randomized Active-Set DCA for Directional Stationarity in Max-Structured DC Programs Commutator-Induced Uncertainty in VAEs Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget Entropy Equivalence Testing Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation Any-Dimensional Invariant Universality Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization Diffusion-based Denoising Beats Vanilla Score Matching in Parameter Estimation: A Theoretical Explanation Resilience Characterization of AI-Native Wireless Receivers via Persistent Homology The General Theory of Localization Methods Group-Algebraic Tensors: Provably-optimal Equivariant Learning and Physical Symmetry Discovery General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions PilotWiMAE: Pilot-Native Representation Learning for Wireless Channels Proximal basin hopping: global optimization with guarantees
Counting Hamiltonian paths between prescribed vertices in...
Jorik Jooken, Carol T. Zamfirescu · 2026-06-01 · via math updates on arXiv.org

For graphs $G$ and $F$, we say that $G$ is $F$-free if $F$ does not occur as an induced subgraph of $G$. This paper is concerned with the following question: Given an $F$-free graph $G$ having two vertices between which there exists at least one Hamiltonian path, how many Hamiltonian paths between these endpoints must exist (in terms of the order of $G$)? Our main result shows that there exists a sharp dichotomy. More precisely, we show that if $F$ is not an induced subgraph of $P_3+sP_1$ for any integer $s \geq 0$, then there exists an infinite family of $F$-free graphs having two vertices between which there exists a unique Hamiltonian path. On the other hand, we prove that if $F$ is an induced subgraph of $P_3+sP_1$ for some integer $s \geq 0$, then any $F$-free graph having two vertices between which there exists a Hamiltonian path contains exponentially many such paths between these two vertices. Our proofs use Ramsey-theoretic methods, a result on the existence of two vertices with low degree in graphs containing a unique Hamiltonian cycle, a path variant of Thomassen's red-independent weakly green-dominating sets, and a structural analysis of Hamiltonian paths in $P_3+sP_1$-free graphs. As an algorithmic consequence we obtain that for every fixed $s \geq 1$, given a Hamiltonian $sP_1$-free graph together with a Hamiltonian cycle, one can decide in linear time whether a second Hamiltonian cycle exists and construct one if it does.