惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
月光博客
月光博客
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Vercel News
Vercel News
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 司徒正美
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
H
Help Net Security
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
L
LangChain Blog
罗磊的独立博客
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 聂微东
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 叶小钗
D
Docker

cs updates on arXiv.org

Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment Agentic Proving for Program Verification MemAudit: Post-hoc Auditing of Poisoned Agent Memory via Causal Attribution and Structural Anomaly Detection OpenSkillEval: Automatically Auditing the Open Skill Ecosystem for LLM Agents One Policy, Infinite NPCs: Persona-Traceable Shared RL Policies for Scalable Game Agents How Human-Like Are Large Language Models? A Register-Aware Linguistic Evaluation Framework Benchmarking Google Embeddings 2 against Open-Source Models for Multilingual Dense Retrieval and RAG Systems Structure-Guided Entity Resolution: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Robust Name Matching in Complex Linguistic Contexts Solving the Aircraft Disassembly Scheduling Problem Co-ReAct: Rubrics as Step-Level Collaborators for ReAct Agents CP or DP? Why Not Both: A Case Study in the Partial Shop Scheduling Problem Asking For An Old Friend: Diagnosing and Mitigating Temporal Failure Modes in LLM-based Statutory Question Answering EDGE-OPD: Internalizing Privileged Context with Evidence Guided On-Policy Distillation ARES: Automated Rubric Synthesis for Scalable LLM Reinforcement Learning SSDAU: Structured Semantic Data Augmentation for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction Naturalistic measure of social norms alignment Articulatory strategy as a source of variation in acoustic vowel dynamics When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems EquiSumm : A Gender Bias-Aware Framework for Inclusive Tweet Summarization Metacognition as Reward: Reinforcing LLM Reasoning via Knowledge and Regulation Signals From Correctness to Preference: A Framework for Personalized Agentic Reinforcement Learning Cultural Adaptation in Large Language Models for Political Discourse Emotion Recognition in Sign Language Conversation ClimateChat-300K: A Multi-Modal Facebook Dataset for Understanding Diverse Perspectives in Climate Communication AraHopeCorpus: Annotation Guidelines and Dataset for Hope Speech in Arabic Social Media Crisis Discourse Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Ventilator Decision Support with Contextual Bandit Preference Learning Convergence Without Understanding: When Language Models Agree on Representations but Disagree on Reasoning DART: Semantic Recoverability for Structured Tool Agents Ontological Knowledge Blocks: Executable Compliance and Profile-Based Validation for Trustworthy AI Systems Parallel Context Compaction for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Serving
Verifying Intent and Harm: A Unified Defense Against LLM-...
[Submitted on 24 Jun 2026] · 2026-06-26 · via cs updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in interactive applications, yet they remain vulnerable to adversarial interactions that induce harmful, deceptive, or policy-violating outputs. Existing defenses typically analyze either user prompts or generated outputs, but not both. However, many real-world attacks exploit a separation between adversarial intent expressed in the prompt and actionable harm manifested only in the response. As a result, prompt-only and response-only defenses frequently miss unsafe interactions that appear benign when viewed from either side in isolation. We present a verification-centric defense framework that jointly evaluates prompt intent and response harm before an LLM response is delivered to a user. The framework employs specialized analysts for intent and harm assessment together with a Judge for conflict resolution. We formalize a threat model for prompt-response attacks and evaluate the framework across five threat categories: jailbreaks, prompt injection, phishing, cyber abuse, and harmful content. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets show that jointly verifying prompt intent and response harm consistently outperforms single-sided defenses and single-agent reasoning baselines. Across threat categories, the framework improves average F1 from 0.90 for the strongest applicable baselines to 0.95 while reducing the average attack success rate to 4.1 percent. Compared with a Single-Agent+CoT baseline, it improves average F1 from 0.87 to 0.95 and reduces the false positive rate on benign-sensitive requests from 0.12 to 0.06. We further evaluate architecture-aware adaptive attacks in which the attacker knows the verifier structure and attempts to bypass individual verification components. Our results suggest that prompt-response verification provides a practical foundation for securing LLM applications against evolving adversarial threats.

Submission history

From: Poojitha Thota [view email]
[v1] Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:00:39 UTC (673 KB)