Generative recommendation models can model user behavior as sequences of events and provide a shared backbone for multiple recommendation tasks. In production, however, pre-training gains do not automatically translate into downstream application improvements: task headroom, repeated-training cost, serving latency, and item freshness all affect transfer. We describe our experience scaling a generative recommender from 2M to 1B backbone parameters, excluding embedding and decoding layers, in a production-scale title recommendation setting. Across multiple downstream tasks, we observe task-dependent scaling behavior: some tasks approach an empirical ceiling within the observed scale range, while others continue to benefit from additional capacity. This motivates using offset scaling-law fits as a diagnostic for where additional model scale may be more or less useful. We then study production constraints that arise when applying the model in practice. Frequent retraining over trillions of behavior tokens makes training and decoding efficiency important; cached serving can make the immediate next-token target stale; and newly launched titles may need to be scored from semantic metadata before collaborative ID embeddings are reliable. We address these issues with multi-token prediction for serving-latency alignment, sampled softmax and a projected decoding head for efficient repeated training, and semantic item towers with collaborative-embedding masking for cold-start adaptation. In a one-week production-shadow evaluation over 1M users, the 1B-backbone model achieves higher MRR than the 2M-backbone baseline across all reported tasks. Overall, the results support treating model scale as one component of a production transfer problem, alongside task headroom, decoding cost, serving-latency alignment, and item generalization.