惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

GbyAI
GbyAI
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
W
WeLiveSecurity
博客园 - 叶小钗
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Security Latest
Security Latest
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
爱范儿
爱范儿
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
S
Secure Thoughts
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
A
About on SuperTechFans
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
IT之家
IT之家
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
H
Hacker News: Front Page
T
Tenable Blog
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
D
DataBreaches.Net
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
博客园_首页
S
Securelist
罗磊的独立博客

Information Age

5 ways AI is rewriting the rules of enterprise storage security - Information Age Stopping bad data from becoming bad business - Information Age Google I/O 2026 shows why enterprise AI governance needs an operating model Moving off the cloud – how to get repatriation right The AI inventory is the EU AI Act artefact most teams underestimate From speed to safety – how regulation is reshaping DevOps Why every organisation needs a minimum viable company strategy Quantum is coming. Here’s what CTOs can be doing today Small Language Models (SLMs) as the gold standard for trust in AI Your employees are waiting for your change programme to blow over How technical debt turns your IT infrastructure into a game you can’t win The business mobility trends driving workforce performance in 2026 Four actions CIOs must take to turn innovation into impact Eliminating blind spots – nailing the IPv6 transition Goodbye Software as a Service, Hello AI as a Service Smart auto-tiering vs. data reduction – logical efficiency vs. architectural efficiency The value of reducing middle office emissions for ESG How to match tech investment with real-world output
Is the SaaSpocalypse already over? - Information Age
Cameron Etezadi · 2026-07-03 · via Information Age

  • If AI can help anyone create and ship a single-purpose tool, businesses built around one use will find it harder to sustain long-term value and are at risk.
  • While DIY AI tools can fix specific issues quickly, they don’t naturally deliver scale, security, governance, or the broader capabilities that businesses rely on as they grow.
  • AI may lower the barrier to creating software, but it will lead to an increase in demand for trusted companies that can help organisations manage that software.
  • The companies that succeed will be the ones that have platforms to help businesses manage the complexity AI creates.

Earlier this year, advances in AI agents triggered yet another SaaSpocalypse moment. SaaS stocks fell across the UK and US as markets began questioning whether businesses would continue paying for software when AI has removed the barriers to building it.

This concern is understandable; if AI makes the creation of software cheaper and easier, won’t the value of software companies fall?  

To the contrary, in just a few months the SaaSpocalypse is already over. Recent market movements suggest investors have come to a different conclusion. AI will change what is considered valuable for SaaS businesses. Safe operations at scale retain tremendous value where mere feature creation has been commoditised. 

AI is exposing SAAS’ weaknesses  

AI is exposing a reality many are starting to recognise: not all software businesses are created equal.  

Prior to the AI revolution, software companies were built around the development of features to solve a specific problem. Replicating those capabilities called for substantial engineering effort, creating barriers to competition. Features were a moat, forcing competitors to replicate and spend. That portion of the cost of goods has effectively been driven to zero as AI has lowered those barriers.

If AI can help anyone create and ship a single-purpose tool, businesses built around one use will find it harder to sustain long-term value and are at risk.

Features that used to require dedicated engineering teams and hours of effort can now be built, copied, or recreated by AI, sometimes in less time than it takes to make a cup of tea. This revelation has left many questioning whether most software businesses will stand the test of time. It has created a distinction between software features and software platforms. Features solve specific problems; platforms manage complexity.  

Building software is easy, running it is not  

The SaaSpocalypse was fuelled by the assumption that if AI made building software easier, businesses would stop buying software altogether. However, building software and operating it are completely different things.   

While DIY AI tools can fix specific issues quickly and pragmatically, they rarely go beyond that. They don’t naturally deliver scale, security, governance, or the broader capabilities that businesses rely on as they grow.  

Organisations that go beyond narrow functionality and have built out platforms can thrive. Customers want entire ecosystems ranging from integrations and experimentation to compliance and operational resilience. In other words, they are purchasing an enduring capability rather than a tool.  

Take a customer relationship management system as an example. It isn’t valuable because it stores customer data. Its value lies in the controls, integrations, and governance frameworks that make entire organisations dependent on it.   

It’s the same principle for software companies. While AI may lower the barrier to creating software, it will lead to an increase in demand for trusted companies that can help organisations manage that software. The challenge for businesses is whether they can operate what they build safely and effectively at scale.

Trust is the new competitive advantage

As organisations adopt AI, they face new challenges around data privacy, regulatory compliance, and model behaviour. Organisations need visibility into how AI systems are making decisions and confidence that changes can be deployed safely, as well as assurance that innovation is not introducing unnecessary risk.

Increasingly, customers are evaluating companies on their ability to manage risk, maintain control, and operate at scale. Capabilities such as audit trails, security controls, and proactive monitoring are just as important as the features themselves.  

This need is only becoming more pronounced as AI accelerates software development. Whilst the technology enables teams to develop and deploy faster than ever before, it also leads to an increased risk of outages and compliance issues.  

The SaaS providers best positioned to succeed will be the ones who have ecosystems set up to enable customers to innovate quickly while continuing to maintain trust, visibility and control.   

Which software categories will succeed?  

Following the ‘SaaSpocalypse’ there are software businesses that will emerge stronger from the AI boom than others.  

The winners of sustainable value include data platforms, security platforms, observability tools, and developer infrastructure providers. Each serves a different purpose, but they all have one thing in common: they have broader, stronger ecosystems which allow organisations to govern AI systems as well as manage risk and deploy new capabilities safely at production scale.

As AI adoption increases, these providers will only become more valuable. With each new development, the need for secure data, reliable monitoring, and safe rollout only grows. Fundamentally, the more AI that organisations adopt, the greater the demand for the platforms that keep those systems running reliably.

What AI means for the future of SaaS

Reports of SaaS’ demise have proven premature, yet AI is undoubtedly causing a market shake-up. However, instead of the extinction event expected, AI has merely caused the landscape to shift. While some software categories will face pressure as capabilities become easier to replicate, others will thrive as AI increases demand for platforms that help organisations operate more effectively.  

The companies that succeed will be the ones that have platforms to help businesses manage the complexity AI creates.

Cameron Etezadi is the CTO at LaunchDarkly.

Read more

Small Language Models (SLMs) as the gold standard for trust in AI – Stephen Edginton of Dext explains why Small Language Models (SLMs) should be the next stage in your evolving AI strategy

Digital friction is where most AI initiatives fail – Get your digital employee experience in line to ease the introduction of AI initiatives into your organisation

Are you really ready for AI? Exposing shadow tools in your organisation – Without clear AI governance, employees often misuse publicly accessible external tools, known as ‘shadow AI’