惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Security Latest
Security Latest
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
小众软件
小众软件
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
博客园 - Franky
Vercel News
Vercel News
H
Help Net Security
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
W
WeLiveSecurity
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
S
Secure Thoughts
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
B
Blog RSS Feed
H
Hacker News: Front Page
P
Proofpoint News Feed
博客园 - 聂微东
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
D
Docker
博客园_首页
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
博客园 - 【当耐特】
F
Fortinet All Blogs
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
A
About on SuperTechFans
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
S
Schneier on Security
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
月光博客
月光博客
IT之家
IT之家
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog

博客园 - Bo Schwarzstein

发布关于PostGIS对于USD格式的拓展 紫微斗数之自化禄真的是损耗嘛? 紫微斗数个人经验之三合或者四化看哪个 A Practical Methodology, HSM, Handler,Service,Model, for Golang Backend Development 问ChatGPT玄学问题,看来命理师还是不会被取代的 Compile Sqlite3 Executable, Static Library, and Shared Library on Linux Benchmark JuiceFS on AWS 1 Work with AWS VPC, Lambda and Internet Far & Unifield Field Augmented Reality 紫微斗数是否对外国人有用 Create CloudFront Signed URL in 1 Minute 2022壬寅年天干四化 《中有成就秘笈》之中央密严刹土 IPFS与般若文海 Moira果老星宗七政四余排盘软件下载 Play Old Diablo 2 on macOS Catalina Use Go Micro Web with HTTP Handler 视频平台设计思路大灌顶 Unity Input System教程
Benchmark JuiceFS at AWS 2
Bo Schwarzstein · 2022-12-23 · via 博客园 - Bo Schwarzstein

Deployed JuiceFS to self-managed K3s cluster with mountOptions

- cache-size=0

to disable any cache.

Use t3a.medium to do the test.

Sequential Read 512M 1 Job

# fio --name=sequential-read --directory=. --rw=read --refill_buffers --bs=4M --size=512M

sequential-read: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (W) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (T) 4096KiB-4096KiB, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.7
Starting 1 process
sequential-read: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
Jobs: 1 (f=1)
sequential-read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=181: Fri Dec 23 04:35:19 2022
read: IOPS=60, BW=241MiB/s (252MB/s)(512MiB/2127msec)
clat (usec): min=3663, max=98850, avg=16572.69, stdev=21702.62
lat (usec): min=3664, max=98851, avg=16576.32, stdev=21702.17
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 3687], 5.00th=[ 3982], 10.00th=[ 4047], 20.00th=[ 4490],
| 30.00th=[ 4817], 40.00th=[ 5211], 50.00th=[ 6325], 60.00th=[ 8291],
| 70.00th=[10290], 80.00th=[19268], 90.00th=[59507], 95.00th=[67634],
| 99.00th=[84411], 99.50th=[99091], 99.90th=[99091], 99.95th=[99091],
| 99.99th=[99091]
bw ( KiB/s): min=196608, max=294912, per=96.34%, avg=237465.75, stdev=45953.47, samples=4
iops : min= 48, max= 72, avg=57.75, stdev=11.44, samples=4
lat (msec) : 4=5.47%, 10=64.06%, 20=10.94%, 50=7.03%, 100=12.50%
cpu : usr=0.00%, sys=10.87%, ctx=2506, majf=0, minf=1033
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=128,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=241MiB/s (252MB/s), 241MiB/s-241MiB/s (252MB/s-252MB/s), io=512MiB (537MB), run=2127-2127msec

Sequential Write 512M 1 Job

# fio --name=sequential-write --directory=. --rw=write --refill_buffers --bs=4M --size=512M

equential-write: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (W) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (T) 4096KiB-4096KiB, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.7
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][-.-%][r=0KiB/s,w=187MiB/s][r=0,w=46 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
sequential-read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=187: Fri Dec 23 04:35:46 2022
write: IOPS=48, BW=194MiB/s (203MB/s)(512MiB/2641msec)
clat (usec): min=3425, max=60858, avg=15901.72, stdev=13752.35
lat (usec): min=3426, max=60859, avg=15903.28, stdev=13752.38
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 3425], 5.00th=[ 3654], 10.00th=[ 3851], 20.00th=[ 4359],
| 30.00th=[ 5211], 40.00th=[ 6652], 50.00th=[11207], 60.00th=[17433],
| 70.00th=[20841], 80.00th=[25297], 90.00th=[33162], 95.00th=[44827],
| 99.00th=[57410], 99.50th=[61080], 99.90th=[61080], 99.95th=[61080],
| 99.99th=[61080]
bw ( KiB/s): min=180224, max=204800, per=98.17%, avg=194891.00, stdev=8957.65, samples=5
iops : min= 44, max= 50, avg=47.40, stdev= 2.19, samples=5
lat (msec) : 4=13.28%, 10=35.16%, 20=17.97%, 50=29.69%, 100=3.91%
cpu : usr=5.80%, sys=14.62%, ctx=4628, majf=0, minf=10
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=0,128,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=194MiB/s (203MB/s), 194MiB/s-194MiB/s (203MB/s-203MB/s), io=512MiB (537MB), run=2641-2641msec

The performance is quite promising.