惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - 叶小钗
F
Fortinet All Blogs
GbyAI
GbyAI
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - 聂微东
I
InfoQ
B
Blog
IT之家
IT之家
美团技术团队
L
LangChain Blog
小众软件
小众软件
C
Check Point Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
V
V2EX
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
A
About on SuperTechFans
博客园 - Franky
P
Proofpoint News Feed
罗磊的独立博客
月光博客
月光博客
V
Visual Studio Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog

博客园 - YFeng_Lee

AppDomain对于静态对象的独享引用 AppDomain 详解(转) .net工具 InstallShield12 添加自定义对话框,并根据输入值修改对应的Config文件。 普通管理类程序开发之难度系数、层次之说法(转自csdn) 待阅读书目 C#开发Windows Service程序 创建一个windows service应用程序 Ext简介(转) Ext的组件结构分析(转) XML与数据库 分析模式 - 责任模式 NHibernate Cascades: the different between all, all-delete-orphans and save-update 企业开发框架NHibernate和Spring.Net简介-4 企业开发框架NHibernate和Spring.Net简介-3 企业开发框架NHibernate和Spring.Net简介-2 企业开发框架NHibernate和Spring.Net简介-1 Nhibernate学习之many-to-many篇(转 明了篇) Nhibernate学习起步之many-to-one篇(转 明了篇)
webHttpBinding+wsHttpBinding+basicHttpBinding的区别 (转)
YFeng_Lee · 2017-03-27 · via 博客园 - YFeng_Lee

1. webHttpBinding (web AJAX/JSON)
2. wsHttpBinding (ASP.NET client)

3. basicHttpBinding (Silverlight)

  • webHttpBinding is the REST-style binding, where you basically just hit a URL and get back a truckload of XML or JSON from the web service

  • basicHttpBinding and wsHttpBinding are two SOAP-based bindings which is quite different from REST. SOAP has the advantage of having WSDL and XSD to describe the service, its methods, and the data being passed around in great detail (REST doesn't have anything like that - yet). On the other hand, you can't just browse to a wsHttpBinding endpoint with your browser and look at XML - you have to use a SOAP client, e.g. the WcfTestClient or your own app

basicHttpBinding and wsHttpBinding, there differences are as follows:

    • basicHttpBinding is the very basic binding - SOAP 1.1, not much in terms of security, not much else in terms of features - but compatible to just about any SOAP client out there --> great for interoperability, weak on features and security

    • wsHttpBinding is the full-blown binding, which supports a ton of WS-* features and standards - it has lots more security features, you can use sessionful connections, you can use reliable messaging, you can use transactional control, you can use streaming for large data - just a lot more stuff, but wsHttpBinding is also a lot *heavier" and adds a lot of overhead to your messages as they travel across the network