惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

B
Blog RSS Feed
量子位
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
美团技术团队
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
H
Help Net Security
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
博客园 - Franky
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
U
Unit 42
J
Java Code Geeks
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
IT之家
IT之家
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
L
LangChain Blog

Archive.is blog

Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog • "Trustworthiness" in my question meant "reputation of being trustworthy", i.e. reputation of you not modifying saved pages to insert fake information into them. Guarantees about your archive being trustworthy are literally on the main page: > Archive.today is a time capsule for web pages! It takes a 'snapshot' of a webpage that will always be online even if the original page disappears > … > and provides a short and reliable link to an unalterable record of any web page. This was true until very recently you chose to tarnish that reputation and began inserting fake information into saved pages. • Do you think there's absolutely no illegal content on your archive, including CSAM? That's simply consequences of you refusing to remove information no matter what. I'm not saying that this approach is wrong or right, you just need to accept these consequences when someone points them out. • Is me saying that some website/company is American also "nationalism" or whatever bad political position you think it is? Or Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog
Archive.is blog
archive-is · 2026-03-03 · via Archive.is blog
  • 匿名

    I wouldn’t say either “yes” or “no” here. That is, ‘yes’ in the sense that we do remove (or blackrectangle) some pages based on user reports, but “no” in the sense that we would not be eligible for safe harbor if we strictly followed the DMCA (i.e., remove everything, without a fee, but based on non-anonymous reports that must include the verifiable name/address/phone number of the reporter). DMCA safe harbor only works for ISPs and certain websites (those that have appointed an agent and registered them with the U.S. Copyright Office); for everyone else, it is still not “compliance” but “voluntary behavior resembling compliance”

    In a strictly legal sense: “no”, because there is no USCO-registered agent.