惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
H
Help Net Security
V
Visual Studio Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
C
Check Point Blog
D
Docker
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
P
Proofpoint News Feed
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 聂微东
The Cloudflare Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
腾讯CDC
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 【当耐特】

Archive.is blog

Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog • "Trustworthiness" in my question meant "reputation of being trustworthy", i.e. reputation of you not modifying saved pages to insert fake information into them. Guarantees about your archive being trustworthy are literally on the main page: > Archive.today is a time capsule for web pages! It takes a 'snapshot' of a webpage that will always be online even if the original page disappears > … > and provides a short and reliable link to an unalterable record of any web page. This was true until very recently you chose to tarnish that reputation and began inserting fake information into saved pages. • Do you think there's absolutely no illegal content on your archive, including CSAM? That's simply consequences of you refusing to remove information no matter what. I'm not saying that this approach is wrong or right, you just need to accept these consequences when someone points them out. • Is me saying that some website/company is American also "nationalism" or whatever bad political position you think it is? Or Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog
Archive.is blog
archive-is · 2026-02-25 · via Archive.is blog
  • anyway, what's your relations to verified.lu?

    匿名

    The same as to the Olympic ice skater: Patokallio’s cherry-picking.

    Better ask Patokallio why he wrote on verified.lu and ignored the ice skater, and how that logic got propagated to become an authoritative source? And how should we treat those who spread this (including Wikipedia), realizing that it is either satire or provocation? With flattery, perhaps?