India has been added to a small group of countries where Meta automatically blocks flagged content on its platforms, allowing authorities to enforce takedowns almost instantly, according to a Hindu report. The move means posts on Facebook and Instagram can now be restricted at scale as soon as requests are submitted by government agencies.

Faster rules, wider powers: A key concern is that content is not restored even if Meta later finds that the takedown may not be legally valid. In such cases, the company reportedly asks the government to issue a separate order to unblock the content. It remains unclear how often such reversals actually happen.

The shift comes after the IT Ministry tightened compliance timelines in February, reducing the response window from 36 hours to a maximum of three hours. Failure to act within this period risks loss of safe harbour protections for platforms.

This tightening of timelines is part of broader rule changes notified in February, which brought AI-generated and deepfake content under stricter regulation and imposed faster takedown and grievance deadlines on platforms. 

Separately, draft amendments to IT Rules released in March propose expanding government oversight to user-generated “news and current affairs” content while linking compliance with official advisories and directions to the retention of safe harbour protections, raising the possibility of increased pressure on platforms to act on content without formal orders. 

Surge in blocking orders: This comes amid a sharp rise in government blocking orders. According to The Indian Express, the number of such orders has doubled over the past year, from around 12,600 in 2024 to about 24,300 in 2025. Around 60% of these were linked to X, while roughly 25% involved Facebook and Instagram and 5% for YouTube. Officials have attributed the spike to the spread of deepfakes and AI-generated content, with emergency blocking powers being used more frequently. 

Recent reporting also points to a wider pattern of enforcement. A March 2026 censorship tracking exercise by MediaNama documented over 40 instances of content blocking, account restrictions, or takedowns in a single month, affecting journalists, political actors, satirists and ordinary users across platforms. 

Concerns over due process: At a recent discussion on IT Rules and the Future of Online Speech in India, hosted by MediaNama on April 23, legal experts raised concerns about how such systems operate. “What we are seeing is a system where restrictions on speech are imposed through processes that are arbitrary, inconsistent, and lack effective remedies; that is the real concern,” said Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation.

“What we are seeing is a system where restrictions on speech are imposed through processes that are arbitrary, inconsistent, and lack effective remedies — that is the real concern.” – @apar1984 at our discussion on IT rules and future of online speech in India

— MediaNama (@medianama) April 23, 2026

Speaking at the same event, Sneha Jain, Partner at Saikrishna & Associates, said, “Governments going after the ‘pipeline’ is not new, it’s the easiest way to regulate speech at scale. When millions are speaking online, platforms become the default point of control.”

“Governments going after the ‘pipeline’ is not new — it’s the easiest way to regulate speech at scale. When millions are speaking online, platforms become the default point of control.” – Sneha Jain pic.twitter.com/ojRRWyTmnI

— MediaNama (@medianama) April 23, 2026

Meta has not shared detailed data on how many posts have been restricted under these rules so far. The figures are expected to be released in its transparency report later in 2026. The company also did not respond to questions on whether it conducts human rights assessments before acting on such requests, although its public documentation claims such reviews are part of its process.

The current mechanism effectively gives authorities the ability to enforce rapid and potentially long-lasting content restrictions, raising questions about oversight and due process in digital censorship.

Read more:

• MeitY tightens AI label rules, mandates continuous disclosure
• J&K DMs impose sweeping 60-day social media curbs; IFF calls them “illegal, overbroad” 
• Molitics’ Instagram suspended days after Facebook ban