惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
Tailwind CSS Blog
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
V
Visual Studio Blog
O
OpenAI News
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
The Cloudflare Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
AI
AI
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
W
WeLiveSecurity
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
腾讯CDC
K
Kaspersky official blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
月光博客
月光博客
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
小众软件
小众软件
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
罗磊的独立博客
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
J
Java Code Geeks
H
Heimdal Security Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
S
Schneier on Security
博客园_首页
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
IT之家
IT之家
Project Zero
Project Zero
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
P
Privacy International News Feed
爱范儿
爱范儿
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, July 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in PAN-OS Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in SimpleHelp Could Allow for Authentication Bypass A Vulnerability in Oracle PeopleSoft PeopleTools Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, June 9, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Check Point Products Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Cisco Products Could Allow for Server-Side Request Forgery Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in NGINX Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, May 12, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Apple Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in PAN-OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in WHM cPanel and WP Squared Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Oracle Quarterly Critical Patches Issued April 21, 2026 A Vulnerability in OpenSSH Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, April 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Progress ShareFile Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Apple Products Could Allow for Privilege Escalation A Vulnerability in F5 Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway Could Allow for Memory Overread A Vulnerability in Oracle Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, March 10, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in pac4j-jwt (JwtAuthenticator) Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Android OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Products Could Allow for Authentication Bypass A Vulnerability in Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, February 10, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Web Help Desk Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Could Allow for Security Feature Bypass A Vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution. A Vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, December 9, 2025 A Vulnerability in React Server Component (RSC) Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in SonicOS Could Allow for Denial of Service (DoS) A Vulnerability in FortiWeb Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, November 11, 2025
Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, January 13, 2026
2026-01-13 · via Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:

2026-002

DATE(S) ISSUED:

01/13/2026

OVERVIEW:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Microsoft products, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution. Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could result in an attacker gaining the same privileges as the logged-on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:

Microsoft has reported that CVE-2026-20805 has been exploited in the wild. 

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • Azure Connected Machine Agent
  • Azure Core shared client library for Python
  • Capability Access Management Service (camsvc)
  • Connected Devices Platform Service (Cdpsvc)
  • Desktop Window Manager
  • Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement (DRTM)
  • Graphics Kernel
  • Host Process for Windows Tasks
  • Inbox COM Objects
  • Microsoft Graphics Component
  • Microsoft Office
  • Microsoft Office Excel
  • Microsoft Office SharePoint
  • Microsoft Office Word
  • Printer Association Object
  • SQL Server
  • Tablet Windows User Interface (TWINUI) Subsystem
  • Windows Admin Center
  • Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock
  • Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service
  • Windows Clipboard Server
  • Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver
  • Windows Common Log File System Driver
  • Windows DWM
  • Windows Error Reporting
  • Windows File Explorer
  • Windows Hello
  • Windows HTTP.sys
  • Windows Hyper-V
  • Windows Installer
  • Windows Internet Connection Sharing (ICS)
  • Windows Kerberos
  • Windows Kernel
  • Windows Kernel Memory
  • Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers
  • Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
  • Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS)
  • Windows Local Session Manager (LSM)
  • Windows Management Services
  • Windows Media
  • Windows NDIS
  • Windows NTFS
  • Windows NTLM
  • Windows Remote Assistance
  • Windows Remote Procedure Call
  • Windows Remote Procedure Call Interface Definition Language (IDL)
  • Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS)
  • Windows Secure Boot
  • Windows Server Update Service
  • Windows Shell
  • Windows SMB Server
  • Windows Telephony Service
  • Windows TPM
  • Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave
  • Windows WalletService
  • Windows Win32K ICOMP

RISK:

Government:

Large and medium government entitiesHIGH

Small governmentMEDIUM

Businesses:

Large and medium business entitiesHIGH

Small business entitiesMEDIUM

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Microsoft products, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution.  

A full list of all vulnerabilities can be found in the Microsoft link in the Reference section.

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could result in an attacker gaining the same privileges as the logged-on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights. 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply appropriate updates provided by Microsoft to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
  • Safeguard 7.1 : Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
  • Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
  • Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
  • Safeguard 7.5 : Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of internal enterprise assets on a quarterly, or more frequent, basis. Conduct both authenticated and unauthenticated scans, using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool.
  • Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
  • Safeguard 12.1: Ensure Network Infrastructure is Up-to-Date: Ensure network infrastructure is kept up-to-date. Example implementations include running the latest stable release of software and/or using currently supported network-as-a-service (NaaS) offerings. Review software versions monthly, or more frequently, to verify software support.
  • Safeguard 18.1: Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program: Establish and maintain a penetration testing program appropriate to the size, complexity, and maturity of the enterprise. Penetration testing program characteristics include scope, such as network, web application, Application Programming Interface (API), hosted services, and physical premise controls; frequency; limitations, such as acceptable hours, and excluded attack types; point of contact information; remediation, such as how findings will be routed internally; and retrospective requirements.
  • Safeguard 18.2: Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests: Perform periodic external penetration tests based on program requirements, no less than annually. External penetration testing must include enterprise and environmental reconnaissance to detect exploitable information. Penetration testing requires specialized skills and experience and must be conducted through a qualified party. The testing may be clear box or opaque box.
  • Safeguard 18.3: Remediate Penetration Test Findings: Remediate penetration test findings based on the enterprise’s policy for remediation scope and prioritization.
  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
  • Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
  • Safeguard 5.5: Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts: Establish and maintain an inventory of service accounts. The inventory, at a minimum, must contain department owner, review date, and purpose. Perform service account reviews to validate that all active accounts are authorized, on a recurring schedule at a minimum quarterly, or more frequently.
  • Vulnerability scanning is used to find potentially exploitable software vulnerabilities to remediate them. (M1016: Vulnerability Scanning)
  • Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.
  • Architect sections of the network to isolate critical systems, functions, or resources. Use physical and logical segmentation to prevent access to potentially sensitive systems and information. Use a DMZ to contain any internet-facing services that should not be exposed from the internal network. Configure separate virtual private cloud (VPC) instances to isolate critical cloud systems. (M1030: Network Segmentation)
  • Safeguard 12.2: Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture: Establish and maintain a secure network architecture. A secure network architecture must address segmentation, least privilege, and availability, at a minimum.
  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
  • Safeguard 10.5: Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Microsoft® Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Windows® Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG), or Apple® System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™.

REFERENCES:

Microsoft