惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
B
Blog RSS Feed
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园_首页
雷峰网
雷峰网
V
Visual Studio Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
A
About on SuperTechFans
量子位
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
U
Unit 42
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
月光博客
月光博客
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
J
Java Code Geeks
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Oracle Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Secure Email Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mikrotik Routers Could Allow for Admin Hijacking A Vulnerability in GitLab Could Allow for Disclosure of Sensitive Data Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in SAP Extended Passport (EPP) Processing Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, September 8, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in DellSecure Connect Gateway Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SonicWall SMA1000 Series Appliances Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in PaperCut Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Oracle Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SonicWall GMS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Zoom Clients Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, August 11, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Web Help Desk Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, July 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution
A Vulnerability Chain in WordPress Core Could Allow for R...
2026-07-20 · via Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:

2026-070

DATE(S) ISSUED:

07/18/2026

OVERVIEW:

A vulnerability chain has been discovered in WordPress Core that could allow for remote code execution. WordPress is an open-source content management system (CMS) used to design, build, and publish personal and commercial websites. Successful exploitation of vulnerability chain could allow for remote code execution in the context of the affected service account. Depending on the privileges associated with the service account, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Services whose accounts are configured to have less rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:

Cybersecurity news outlets are reporting public proof-of-concepts available. The MS-ISAC SOC has also observed telemetry that indicate automated scanning and exploitation for this vulnerability chain against membership. 

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • WordPress 7 versions prior to 7.0.2
  • WordPress 6.9 versions prior to 6.9.5
  • WordPress 6.8 versions prior to 6.8.6

RISK:

Government:

Large and medium government entitiesHIGH

Small governmentMEDIUM

Businesses:

Large and medium business entitiesHIGH

Small business entitiesMEDIUM

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:

A vulnerability chain has been discovered in WordPress Core that could allow for remote code execution. An unauthenticated, anonymous user can remotely exploit this chain by crafting and sending a SQL injection via HTTP POST request with parameters not sanitized by affected systems. Details of these vulnerabilities are as follows:

Tactic: Initial Access (TA0001)

TechniqueExploit Public-Facing Application (T1190)

  • CVE-2026-60137: Vulnerable WordPress systems do not properly sanitize the author__not_in parameter of WP_Query, which could allow SQL Injection when a plugin or theme passes untrusted input to the parameter.
  • CVE-2026-63030: Vulnerable WordPress systems are affected by a REST API batch endpoint route confusion issue which, combined with CVE-2026-60137, could allow an attacker to perform SQL Injection and achieve Remote Code Execution.

Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow for Remote Code Execution in the context of the affected service account. Depending on the privileges associated with the service account an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Services whose accounts are configured to have fewer rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative rights.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply appropriate updates provided by WordPress to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
  • Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
  • Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
  • Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
  • Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
  • Safeguard 12.1: Ensure Network Infrastructure is Up-to-Date: Ensure network infrastructure is kept up-to-date. Example implementations include running the latest stable release of software and/or using currently supported network-as-a-service (NaaS) offerings. Review software versions monthly, or more frequently, to verify software support.
  • Vulnerability scanning is used to find potentially exploitable software vulnerabilities to remediate them. (M1016: Vulnerability Scanning)
  • Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.
  • Safeguard 18.1: Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program: Establish and maintain a penetration testing program appropriate to the size, complexity, and maturity of the enterprise. Penetration testing program characteristics include scope, such as network, web application, Application Programming Interface (API), hosted services, and physical premise controls; frequency; limitations, such as acceptable hours, and excluded attack types; point of contact information; remediation, such as how findings will be routed internally; and retrospective requirements.
  • Safeguard 18.3: Remediate Penetration Test Findings: Remediate penetration test findings based on the enterprise’s policy for remediation scope and prioritization.
  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
  • Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
  • Safeguard 5.5: Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts: Establish and maintain an inventory of service accounts. The inventory, at a minimum, must contain department owner, review date, and purpose. Perform service account reviews to validate that all active accounts are authorized, on a recurring schedule at a minimum quarterly, or more frequently.
  • Architect sections of the network to isolate critical systems, functions, or resources. Use physical and logical segmentation to prevent access to potentially sensitive systems and information. Use a DMZ to contain any internet-facing services that should not be exposed from the internal network. Configure separate virtual private cloud (VPC) instances to isolate critical cloud systems. (M1030: Network Segmentation)
  • Safeguard 12.2: Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture: Establish and maintain a secure network architecture. A secure network architecture must address segmentation, least privilege, and availability, at a minimum.
  • Safeguard 12.8: Establish and Maintain Dedicated Computing Resources for All Administrative Work: Establish and maintain dedicated computing resources, either physically or logically separated, for all administrative tasks or tasks requiring administrative access. The computing resources should be segmented from the enterprise's primary network and not be allowed internet access.

REFERENCES:

Bleeping Computer
CVE
Cyber Security News
Searchlight Cyber
Wordpress