惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
J
Java Code Geeks
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
雷峰网
雷峰网
博客园_首页
小众软件
小众软件
美团技术团队
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
腾讯CDC
P
Proofpoint News Feed
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
U
Unit 42
The Cloudflare Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗

cs.HC updates on arXiv.org

Quantitative Movement Testing: Measuring Patient Movements from a Single Smartphone Video Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input The New Social Image: How AI Competency and AI Proactivity Influence Self- and Peer-Perceptions in the Workplace TUX: Measuring Human--AI Tacit Understanding LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback VideoFDB: Evaluating Full-Duplex Vision-Speech Capabilities in Conversational Agents Label Over Logic? How Source Cues Bias Human Fallacy Judgments More Than LLMs Inform, Coach, Relate, Listen: Auditing LLM Caregiving Support Roles How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions MetaRanker: Human-in-the-loop Active Ranking for Metalens Image Quality Analyzing Persona Effects in Generated Explanations from Multimodal LLM Agents in Urban Perception First head-to-head comparison of agentic AI applied to the analysis of simulated data of the Einstein Telescope Granuscore: A Reference-Free Measure of Granularity for Text Analysis and Question Answering The Timing Dependencies of Trust: Speed, Accuracy, and cBCI Neuro-Decoupling in Human-AI Teams Bayesian Distributional Models of Executive Functioning Visual Matters: Connecting Aesthetic Appeal and Production Quality of Photos, Infographics and Data Visualizations to Credibility of Social Media Posts Data-driven Head Motion Generation through Natural Gaze-Head Coordination Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why Perceptually Lossless Tactile Texture Synthesis with Compact Spectral Envelope Models MambaGaze: Bidirectional Mamba with Explicit Missing Data Modeling for Cognitive Load Assessment from Eye-Gaze Tracking Data CogAdapt: Transferring Clinical ECG Foundation Models to Wearable Cognitive Load Assessment via Lead Adaptation Augmented Analytics and Decision Quality: The Role of Trust among Non-Technical BI Users Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build PaintCopilot: Modeling Painting as Autonomous Artistic Continuation Personality Engineering with AI Agents: A New Methodology for Negotiation Research PULSE: Agentic Investigation with Passive Sensing for Proactive Intervention in Cancer Survivorship Access Timing as Scaffolding: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to GenAI in Education Conversations in Space: Structuring Non-Linear LLM Interactions on a Canvas MAPLE: Self-Supervised Learning-Enhanced Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction for Visual Analysis nASR: An End-to-End Trainable Neural Layer for Channel-Level EEG Artifact Subspace Reconstruction in Real-Time BCI
AV-TLX for measuring (mental) workload while driving AVs:...
Saeedeh Mosaferchi, Alireza Mortezapour, Magnus Liebherr, France · 2025-03-26 · via cs.HC updates on arXiv.org

The introduction of automated vehicles has redefined the level of interaction between the driver and the vehicle, introducing new tasks and so impose different workloads. Existing tools such as NASA-TLX and DALI are still used to assess driving workload in automated vehicles, despite not accounting for new tasks. This study introduces AV-TLX, a specialized tool for measuring workload in Level 3 automated driving. The development process began with a narrative literature review to identify the primary factors influencing workload. This was followed by a series of qualitative sessions during which the dimensions and later the questions of the questionnaire were designed. The tools validity was first assessed using CVR and CVI indices, and its reliability and convergent validity were evaluated using a dynamic driving simulator with high fidelity. The final version of AV-TLX comprises 19 questions across 8 subscales, demonstrating excellent reliability (0.86) and validity (CVR > 0.78). An agreement scores between the results of AV-TLX and NASA-TLX in the simulation study was 0.6, which is considered acceptable for the consistency of two questionnaires. Furthermore, this questionnaire can be utilized in two ways. First by reporting the overall workload and/or divided into 8 primary subscales, or by categorizing the questions into two groups including takeover task workload and automated driving task workload. The final version of this questionnaire, as presented in the paper, is available for use in future studies focusing on Level 3 automated driving.