Subset sum is a very old and fundamental problem in theoretical computer science. In this problem, $n$ items with weights $w_1, w_2, w_3, \ldots, w_n$ are given as input and the goal is to find out if there is a subset of them whose weights sum up to a given value $t$. While the problem is NP-hard in general, when the values are non-negative integer, subset sum can be solved in pseudo-polynomial time $~\widetilde O(n+t)$. In this work, we consider the dynamic variant of subset sum. In this setting, an upper bound $\tmax$ is provided in advance to the algorithm and in each operation, either a new item is added to the problem or for a given integer value $t \leq \tmax$, the algorithm is required to output whether there is a subset of items whose sum of weights is equal to $t$. Unfortunately, none of the existing subset sum algorithms is able to process these operations in truly sublinear time\footnote{Truly sublinear means $n^{1-Ω(1)}$.} in terms of $\tmax$. Our main contribution is an algorithm whose amortized processing time\footnote{Since the runtimes are amortized, we do not use separate terms update time and query time for different operations and use processing time for all types of operations.} for each operation is truly sublinear in $\tmax$ when the number of operations is at least $\tmax^{2/3+Ω(1)}$. We also show that when both element addition and element removal are allowed, there is no algorithm that can process each operation in time $\tmax^{1-Ω(1)}$ on average unless \textsf{SETH}\footnote{The \textit{strong exponential time hypothesis} states that no algorithm can solve the satisfiability problem in time $2^{n(1-Ω(1))}$.} fails.