惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

A
About on SuperTechFans
博客园 - 聂微东
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 司徒正美
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
美团技术团队
量子位
The Cloudflare Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
IT之家
IT之家
爱范儿
爱范儿
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - Franky
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
B
Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
I
InfoQ
GbyAI
GbyAI
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
小众软件
小众软件
H
Help Net Security
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog

cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting Algorithms with Polynomially-Improved Approximation Factors for the $2 \rightarrow q$ Norm, and Applications A computational phase transition for learning-to-sample from Ising models Covering vertices by sequential stars Fermi-Dirac machines as quantizations of neurons A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vertex Elimination Algorithms for Algorithmic Differentiation A Tight Bound on Localization of Electrical Flows Optimal Dimension-Free Sampling for Regularized Classification Reducing the Randomness in Partition Oracles for Bounded Degree Minor-Free Graphs Beyond the Half-Approximation: Fair and Efficient Online Class Matching Efficient Uniform Sampling of Surjections via their Profiles Tractable Maximization of Budgeted Phylogenetic Diversity on Networks Utilizing Node Scanwidth Fairness in Aggregation: Optimal Top-$k$ and Improved Full Ranking Learning-Augmented Online Scheduling with Parsimonious Preemption Entropy Equivalence Testing Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Trees The Secretary Problem with a Stochastic Precursor Polynomial-Time Robust Multiclass Linear Classification under Gaussian Marginals Efficient Banzhaf-Based Data Valuation for $k$-Nearest Neighbors Classification Block-Sphere Vector Quantization An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection Iterative Chow Filtering for Learning with Distribution Shift Complexity of Non-Log-Concave Sampling in Fisher Information Stochastic Matching via Local Sparsification Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Provable Quantization with Randomized Hadamard Transform Min-Max Optimization Requires Exponentially Many Queries Fast and Compact Graph Cuts for the Boykov-Kolmogorov Algorithm A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling
A Combinatorial Cut-Toggling Algorithm for Solving Laplac...
Monika Henzinger, Billy Jin, Richard Peng, David P. Williamson · 2020-10-30 · via cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

Over the last two decades, a significant line of work in theoretical algorithms has made progress in solving linear systems whose coefficient matrix is the Laplacian matrix of a weighted graph. The solution of the linear system can be interpreted as the potentials of an electrical flow. Kelner, Orrechia, Sidford, and Zhu (STOC 2013) give a combinatorial, near-linear time algorithm that maintains the Kirchoff Current Law, and gradually enforces the Kirchoff Potential Law by updating flows around cycles (cycle toggling). In this paper, we consider a dual version of the algorithm that maintains the Kirchoff Potential Law, and gradually enforces the Kirchoff Current Law by cut toggling: each iteration updates all potentials on one side of a fundamental cut of a spanning tree by the same amount. We prove that this dual algorithm also runs in a near-linear number of iterations. We show, however, that if we abstract cut toggling as a natural data structure problem, this problem can be reduced to the online vector-matrix-vector problem, which has been conjectured to be difficult for dynamic algorithms by Henzinger, Krinninger, Nanongkai, and Saranurak (STOC 2015). The conjecture implies that a straightforward implementation of the cut-toggling algorithm requires essentially linear time per iteration. To circumvent the lower bound, we batch update steps, and perform them simultaneously instead of sequentially. An appropriate choice of batching leads to an $\tilde{O}(m^{1.5})$ time cut-toggling algorithm for solving Laplacian systems. Furthermore, if we sparsify the graph and call our algorithm recursively on the Laplacian system implied by batching and sparsifying, the running time can be reduced to $O(m^{1+ε})$ for any $ε> 0$. Thus, the dual cut-toggling algorithm can achieve (almost) the same running time as its primal cycle-toggling counterpart.