惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
J
Java Code Geeks
B
Blog
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
博客园 - Franky
罗磊的独立博客
月光博客
月光博客
Jina AI
Jina AI
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
D
Docker
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
G
Google Developers Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
I
InfoQ
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
D
DataBreaches.Net
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale

cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting Algorithms with Polynomially-Improved Approximation Factors for the $2 \rightarrow q$ Norm, and Applications A computational phase transition for learning-to-sample from Ising models Covering vertices by sequential stars Fermi-Dirac machines as quantizations of neurons A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vertex Elimination Algorithms for Algorithmic Differentiation A Tight Bound on Localization of Electrical Flows Optimal Dimension-Free Sampling for Regularized Classification Reducing the Randomness in Partition Oracles for Bounded Degree Minor-Free Graphs Beyond the Half-Approximation: Fair and Efficient Online Class Matching Efficient Uniform Sampling of Surjections via their Profiles Tractable Maximization of Budgeted Phylogenetic Diversity on Networks Utilizing Node Scanwidth Fairness in Aggregation: Optimal Top-$k$ and Improved Full Ranking Learning-Augmented Online Scheduling with Parsimonious Preemption Entropy Equivalence Testing Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Trees The Secretary Problem with a Stochastic Precursor Polynomial-Time Robust Multiclass Linear Classification under Gaussian Marginals Efficient Banzhaf-Based Data Valuation for $k$-Nearest Neighbors Classification Block-Sphere Vector Quantization An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection Iterative Chow Filtering for Learning with Distribution Shift Complexity of Non-Log-Concave Sampling in Fisher Information Stochastic Matching via Local Sparsification Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Provable Quantization with Randomized Hadamard Transform Min-Max Optimization Requires Exponentially Many Queries Fast and Compact Graph Cuts for the Boykov-Kolmogorov Algorithm A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling
Continual Counting with Gradual Privacy Expiration
Joel Daniel Andersson, Monika Henzinger, Rasmus Pagh, Teresa Ann · 2024-06-06 · via cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

Differential privacy with gradual expiration models the setting where data items arrive in a stream and at a given time $t$ the privacy loss guaranteed for a data item seen at time $(t-d)$ is $εg(d)$, where $g$ is a monotonically non-decreasing function. We study the fundamental $\textit{continual (binary) counting}$ problem where each data item consists of a bit, and the algorithm needs to output at each time step the sum of all the bits streamed so far. For a stream of length $T$ and privacy $\textit{without}$ expiration continual counting is possible with maximum (over all time steps) additive error $O(\log^2(T)/\varepsilon)$ and the best known lower bound is $Ω(\log(T)/\varepsilon)$; closing this gap is a challenging open problem. We show that the situation is very different for privacy with gradual expiration by giving upper and lower bounds for a large set of expiration functions $g$. Specifically, our algorithm achieves an additive error of $ O(\log(T)/ε)$ for a large set of privacy expiration functions. We also give a lower bound that shows that if $C$ is the additive error of any $ε$-DP algorithm for this problem, then the product of $C$ and the privacy expiration function after $2C$ steps must be $Ω(\log(T)/ε)$. Our algorithm matches this lower bound as its additive error is $O(\log(T)/ε)$, even when $g(2C) = O(1)$. Our empirical evaluation shows that we achieve a slowly growing privacy loss with significantly smaller empirical privacy loss for large values of $d$ than a natural baseline algorithm.