We consider a crowdsourcing model in which $n$ workers are asked to rate the quality of $n$ items previously generated by other workers. An unknown set of $αn$ workers generate reliable ratings, while the remaining workers may behave arbitrarily and possibly adversarially. The manager of the experiment can also manually evaluate the quality of a small number of items, and wishes to curate together almost all of the high-quality items with at most an $ε$ fraction of low-quality items. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that this is possible with an amount of work required of the manager, and each worker, that does not scale with $n$: the dataset can be curated with $\tilde{O}\Big(\frac{1}{βα^3ε^4}\Big)$ ratings per worker, and $\tilde{O}\Big(\frac{1}{βε^2}\Big)$ ratings by the manager, where $β$ is the fraction of high-quality items. Our results extend to the more general setting of peer prediction, including peer grading in online classrooms.