We consider approximation algorithms for packing integer programs (PIPs) of the form $\max\{\langle c, x\rangle : Ax \le b, x \in \{0,1\}^n\}$ where $c$, $A$, and $b$ are nonnegative. We let $W = \min_{i,j} b_i / A_{i,j}$ denote the width of $A$ which is at least $1$. Previous work by Bansal et al. \cite{bansal-sparse} obtained an $Ω(\frac{1}{Δ_0^{1/\lfloor W \rfloor}})$-approximation ratio where $Δ_0$ is the maximum number of nonzeroes in any column of $A$ (in other words the $\ell_0$-column sparsity of $A$). They raised the question of obtaining approximation ratios based on the $\ell_1$-column sparsity of $A$ (denoted by $Δ_1$) which can be much smaller than $Δ_0$. Motivated by recent work on covering integer programs (CIPs) \cite{cq,chs-16} we show that simple algorithms based on randomized rounding followed by alteration, similar to those of Bansal et al. \cite{bansal-sparse} (but with a twist), yield approximation ratios for PIPs based on $Δ_1$. First, following an integrality gap example from \cite{bansal-sparse}, we observe that the case of $W=1$ is as hard as maximum independent set even when $Δ_1 \le 2$. In sharp contrast to this negative result, as soon as width is strictly larger than one, we obtain positive results via the natural LP relaxation. For PIPs with width $W = 1 + ε$ where $ε\in (0,1]$, we obtain an $Ω(ε^2/Δ_1)$-approximation. In the large width regime, when $W \ge 2$, we obtain an $Ω((\frac{1}{1 + Δ_1/W})^{1/(W-1)})$-approximation. We also obtain a $(1-ε)$-approximation when $W = Ω(\frac{\log (Δ_1/ε)}{ε^2})$.