Parameterized local search combines classic local search heuristics with the paradigm of parameterized algorithmics. While most local search algorithms aim to improve given solutions by performing one single operation on a given solution, the parameterized approach aims to improve a solution by performing $k$ simultaneous operations. Herein, $k$ is a parameter called search radius for which the value can be chosen by a user. One major goal in the field of parameterized local search is to outline the trade-off between the size of $k$ and the running time of the local search step. In this work, we introduce an abstract framework that generalizes natural parameterized local search approaches for a large class of partitioning problems: Given $n$ items that are partitioned into $b$ bins and a target function that evaluates the quality of the current partition, one asks whether it is possible to improve the solution by removing up to $k$ items from their current bins and reassigning them to other bins. Among others, our framework applies for the local search versions of problems like Cluster Editing, Vector Bin Packing, and Nash Social Welfare. Motivated by a real-world application of the problem Vector Bin Packing, we introduce a parameter called number of types $τ\le n$ and show that all problems fitting in our framework can be solved in $τ^k 2^{O(k)} |I|^{O(1)}$ time, where $|I|$ denotes the total input size. In case of Cluster Editing, the parameter $τ$ generalizes the well-known parameter neighborhood diversity of the input graph. We complement this by showing that for all considered problems, an algorithm significantly improving over our algorithm with running time $τ^k 2^{O(k)} |I|^{O(1)}$ would contradict the ETH. Additionally, we show that even on very restricted instances, all considered problems are W[1]-hard when parameterized by the search radius $k$ alone.