A kernelization for a parameterized decision problem $\mathcal{Q}$ is a polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces any parameterized instance $(x,k)$ into an instance $(x',k')$ whose size is bounded by a function of $k$ alone and which has the same yes/no answer for $\mathcal{Q}$. Such preprocessing algorithms cannot exist in the context of counting problems, when the answer to be preserved is the number of solutions, since this number can be arbitrarily large compared to $k$. However, we show that for counting minimum feedback vertex sets of size at most $k$, and for counting minimum dominating sets of size at most $k$ in a planar graph, there is a polynomial-time algorithm that either outputs the answer or reduces to an instance $(G',k')$ of size polynomial in $k$ with the same number of minimum solutions. This shows that a meaningful theory of kernelization for counting problems is possible and opens the door for future developments. Our algorithms exploit that if the number of solutions exceeds $2^{\mathsf{poly}(k)}$, the size of the input is exponential in terms of $k$ so that the running time of a parameterized counting algorithm can be bounded by $\mathsf{poly}(n)$. Otherwise, we can use gadgets that slightly increase $k$ to represent choices among $2^{O(k)}$ options by only $\mathsf{poly}(k)$ vertices.