Online bipartite matching, where agents are known in advance but items arrive sequentially and must be irrevocably assigned, is fundamental to problems ranging from ride-sharing to online advertising. When agents belong to classes such as demographic groups or geographic regions, fairness demands equitable treatment across these groups. Recent work introduced class envy-freeness (CEF), a natural extension of the classical fair division notion: an algorithm is $α$-CEF if each class receives value at least an $α$ fraction of what it could extract from any other class's bundle. However, all known algorithms achieving constant-factor CEF guarantees attain utilitarian social welfare (total matching value) of at most $\frac{1}{2}$ times the optimum, far below the $1-\frac{1}{e} \approx 0.632$ achievable without fairness constraints. We resolve the open question of whether fairness necessitates this efficiency loss, by introducing threshold-based algorithms parameterized by $γ\in [0,1]$ that equalize allocations across classes until threshold $γ$, then maximize efficiency. For divisible matching, this yields simultaneous $(1-e^{-γ})$-CEF and $(1 - \frac{e^{γ-1}}{γ+1})$-USW guarantees; for indivisible matching, $\fracγ{2}$-CEF with the same USW. Setting $γ> 0$ produces the first algorithms beating $\frac{1}{2}$-USW while maintaining constant CEF. We complement this with a novel upper bound construction, proving no non-wasteful $α$-CEF algorithm can exceed $\frac{1 +α- e^{α-1}}{1+α}$-USW and correcting prior bounds that were vacuous for $α< 0.58$. Our upper bound nearly matches our algorithms' performance, giving the first substantive characterization of the price of fairness in online class matching.