惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园_首页
J
Java Code Geeks
Jina AI
Jina AI
B
Blog RSS Feed
量子位
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
L
LangChain Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 聂微东
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
I
InfoQ
罗磊的独立博客
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
爱范儿
爱范儿
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
雷峰网
雷峰网

cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting Algorithms with Polynomially-Improved Approximation Factors for the $2 \rightarrow q$ Norm, and Applications A computational phase transition for learning-to-sample from Ising models Covering vertices by sequential stars Fermi-Dirac machines as quantizations of neurons A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vertex Elimination Algorithms for Algorithmic Differentiation A Tight Bound on Localization of Electrical Flows Optimal Dimension-Free Sampling for Regularized Classification Reducing the Randomness in Partition Oracles for Bounded Degree Minor-Free Graphs Beyond the Half-Approximation: Fair and Efficient Online Class Matching Efficient Uniform Sampling of Surjections via their Profiles Tractable Maximization of Budgeted Phylogenetic Diversity on Networks Utilizing Node Scanwidth Fairness in Aggregation: Optimal Top-$k$ and Improved Full Ranking Learning-Augmented Online Scheduling with Parsimonious Preemption Entropy Equivalence Testing Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Trees The Secretary Problem with a Stochastic Precursor Polynomial-Time Robust Multiclass Linear Classification under Gaussian Marginals Efficient Banzhaf-Based Data Valuation for $k$-Nearest Neighbors Classification Block-Sphere Vector Quantization An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection Iterative Chow Filtering for Learning with Distribution Shift Complexity of Non-Log-Concave Sampling in Fisher Information Stochastic Matching via Local Sparsification Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Provable Quantization with Randomized Hadamard Transform Min-Max Optimization Requires Exponentially Many Queries Fast and Compact Graph Cuts for the Boykov-Kolmogorov Algorithm A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling
Various proofs of the Fundamental Theorem of Markov Chains
Somenath Biswas · 2022-04-02 · via cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

This paper is a survey of various proofs of the so called {\em fundamental theorem of Markov chains}: every ergodic Markov chain has a unique positive stationary distribution and the chain attains this distribution in the limit independent of the initial distribution the chain started with. As Markov chains are stochastic processes, it is natural to use probability based arguments for proofs. At the same time, the dynamics of a Markov chain is completely captured by its initial distribution, which is a vector, and its transition probability matrix. Therefore, arguments based on matrix analysis and linear algebra can also be used. The proofs discussed below use one or the other of these two types of arguments, except in one case where the argument is graph theoretic. Appropriate credits to the various proofs are given in the main text. Our first proof is entirely elementary, and yet the proof is also quite simple. The proof also suggests a mixing time bound, which we prove, but this bound in many cases will not be the best bound. One approach in proving the fundamental theorem breaks the proof in two parts: (i) show the existence of a unique positive stationary distribution for irreducible Markov chains, and (ii) assuming that an ergodic chain does have a stationary distribution, show that the chain will converge in the limit to that distribution irrespective of the initial distribution. For (i), we survey two proofs, one uses probability arguments, and the other uses graph theoretic arguments. For (ii), first we give a coupling based proof (coupling is a probability based technique), the other uses matrix analysis. Finally, we give a proof of the fundamental theorem using only linear algebra concepts.