惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

量子位
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
小众软件
小众软件
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
IT之家
IT之家
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园 - 【当耐特】
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
V
V2EX
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - Franky
F
Fortinet All Blogs
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
GbyAI
GbyAI
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
D
Docker
博客园 - 聂微东
C
Check Point Blog
H
Help Net Security

cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting Algorithms with Polynomially-Improved Approximation Factors for the $2 \rightarrow q$ Norm, and Applications A computational phase transition for learning-to-sample from Ising models Covering vertices by sequential stars Fermi-Dirac machines as quantizations of neurons A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vertex Elimination Algorithms for Algorithmic Differentiation A Tight Bound on Localization of Electrical Flows Optimal Dimension-Free Sampling for Regularized Classification Reducing the Randomness in Partition Oracles for Bounded Degree Minor-Free Graphs Beyond the Half-Approximation: Fair and Efficient Online Class Matching Efficient Uniform Sampling of Surjections via their Profiles Tractable Maximization of Budgeted Phylogenetic Diversity on Networks Utilizing Node Scanwidth Fairness in Aggregation: Optimal Top-$k$ and Improved Full Ranking Learning-Augmented Online Scheduling with Parsimonious Preemption Entropy Equivalence Testing Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Trees The Secretary Problem with a Stochastic Precursor Polynomial-Time Robust Multiclass Linear Classification under Gaussian Marginals Efficient Banzhaf-Based Data Valuation for $k$-Nearest Neighbors Classification Block-Sphere Vector Quantization An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection Iterative Chow Filtering for Learning with Distribution Shift Complexity of Non-Log-Concave Sampling in Fisher Information Stochastic Matching via Local Sparsification Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Provable Quantization with Randomized Hadamard Transform Min-Max Optimization Requires Exponentially Many Queries Fast and Compact Graph Cuts for the Boykov-Kolmogorov Algorithm A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling
Density-friendly Graph Decomposition
Nikolaj Tatti · 2019-04-06 · via cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

Decomposing a graph into a hierarchical structure via $k$-core analysis is a standard operation in any modern graph-mining toolkit. $k$-core decomposition is a simple and efficient method that allows to analyze a graph beyond its mere degree distribution. More specifically, it is used to identify areas in the graph of increasing centrality and connectedness, and it allows to reveal the structural organization of the graph. Despite the fact that $k$-core analysis relies on vertex degrees, $k$-cores do not satisfy a certain, rather natural, density property. Simply put, the most central $k$-core is not necessarily the densest subgraph. This inconsistency between $k$-cores and graph density provides the basis of our study. We start by defining what it means for a subgraph to be locally-dense, and we show that our definition entails a nested chain decomposition of the graph, similar to the one given by $k$-cores, but in this case the components are arranged in order of increasing density. We show that such a locally-dense decomposition for a graph $G=(V,E)$ can be computed in polynomial time. The running time of the exact decomposition algorithm is $O(|V|^2|E|)$ but is significantly faster in practice. In addition, we develop a linear-time algorithm that provides a factor-2 approximation to the optimal locally-dense decomposition. Furthermore, we show that the $k$-core decomposition is also a factor-2 approximation, however, as demonstrated by our experimental evaluation, in practice $k$-cores have different structure than locally-dense subgraphs, and as predicted by the theory, $k$-cores are not always well-aligned with graph density.