View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A tree-packing is a collection of spanning trees of a graph. It has been a useful tool for computing the minimum cut in static, dynamic, and distributed settings. In particular, [Thorup, Comb. 2007] used them to obtain his dynamic min-cut algorithm with $\tilde O(\lambda^{14.5}\sqrt{n})$ worst-case update time. We reexamine this relationship, showing that we need to maintain fewer spanning trees for such a result; we show that we only need to pack $\Theta(\lambda^3 \log m)$ greedy trees to guarantee a 1-respecting cut or a trivial cut in some contracted graph.
Based on this structural result, we then provide a deterministic algorithm for fully dynamic exact min-cut, that has $\tilde O(\lambda^{5.5}\sqrt{n})$ worst-case update time, for min-cut value bounded by $\lambda$. In particular, this also leads to an algorithm for general fully dynamic exact min-cut with $\tilde O(m^{1-1/12})$ amortized update time, improving upon $\tilde O(m^{1-1/31})$ [Goranci et al., SODA 2023].
We also give the first fully dynamic algorithm that maintains a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation of the fractional arboricity -- which is strictly harder than the integral arboricity. Our algorithm is deterministic and has $O(\alpha \log^6m/\varepsilon^4)$ amortized update time, for arboricity at most $\alpha$. We extend these results to a Monte Carlo algorithm with $O(\text{poly}(\log m,\varepsilon^{-1}))$ amortized update time against an adaptive adversary. Our algorithms work on multi-graphs as well.
Both result are obtained by exploring the connection between the min-cut/arboricity and (greedy) tree-packing. We investigate tree-packing in a broader sense; including a lower bound for greedy tree-packing, which - to the best of our knowledge - is the first progress on this topic since [Thorup, Comb. 2007].

Submission history

From: Tijn De Vos [view email]
[v1] Wed, 15 May 2024 07:13:08 UTC (1,002 KB)
[v2] Wed, 4 Dec 2024 09:25:43 UTC (1,011 KB)
[v3] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:57:09 UTC (963 KB)