惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

爱范儿
爱范儿
量子位
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
小众软件
小众软件
J
Java Code Geeks
B
Blog
V
V2EX
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Y
Y Combinator Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
The Cloudflare Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
D
DataBreaches.Net
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - Franky
H
Help Net Security
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
L
LangChain Blog

LWN.net comments

tcmalloc's weird hack [LWN.net] Fixed? [LWN.net] mpd [LWN.net] Userspace AX.25 [LWN.net] RIP [LWN.net] My two cents... [LWN.net] pipx [LWN.net] Tragedy [LWN.net] A young man destined for glory [LWN.net] And 'less' won't let you search [LWN.net] A great loss [LWN.net] Sad and shocking news [LWN.net] Easy migration from Clementine [LWN.net] Sad coincidence [LWN.net] GNOME is actually usable thanks to Seth et al [LWN.net] Sad news :( [LWN.net] armhf supports preempt_rt [LWN.net] MusicBrainz accurracy [LWN.net] On open source maintainership [LWN.net] Let's stop here [LWN.net] Not a new thing [LWN.net] uv is indeed great pgmoneta Some comments on this on a Postgres blog feed [LWN.net] uv [LWN.net] going to Debian [LWN.net] Upgrading 64-bit-capable systems to 64-bit kernels? [LWN.net] Free Software foundations Maintainers can wait for code review but not for publish review? A reasonably extreme point of view [LWN.net]
Surprising [LWN.net]
farnz · 2026-05-27 · via LWN.net comments

Surprising

Posted May 27, 2026 11:15 UTC (Wed) by farnz (subscriber, #17727)
In reply to: Surprising by SLi
Parent article: Comprehensive Response to Bambu's AGPLv3 Violations (Software Freedom Conservancy)

The additional restriction Bambu Labs appear to be trying to impose is that you cannot publish modified code that, in Bambu's sole opinion, makes it harder for them to control the use of their services, if that code is in any way derived from their AGPLv3 code releases.

They're doing this because it's impossible to distinguish an authorized client from an unauthorized one based solely on observing client behaviour - the overlap between "modified client, using our services in a way we dislike" and "unmodified client, using our services in a way we're content with" is huge, and if they blocked users for misuse of the cloud service in a way that caused them issues, they'd block a large number of customers using the Bambu Labs build of their official application.

So, they're attempting to say that it's not permissible to take the Bambu Labs AGPLv3 source code, and modify it in a way that doesn't also ensure that the client authorization code is modified, nor is it permissible to take the AGPLv3 client authorization code and integrate it with another project - you must not create derivative works of the AGPLv3 code where Bambu Labs deems it an unacceptable modification.