惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

P
Proofpoint News Feed
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
GbyAI
GbyAI
C
Check Point Blog
腾讯CDC
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
L
LangChain Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
小众软件
小众软件
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园_首页
Jina AI
Jina AI
美团技术团队
H
Help Net Security
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Y
Y Combinator Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题

Compliance Solutions for Websites, Apps and Organizations | iubenda

AI can build your website. It can't manage your consent. | iubenda Browser signals and machine-readable consent: what they are and what the EU’s Digital Omnibus could change California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): Complete Guide How to increase your cookie banner opt-in rates: 5 mistakes to fix today | iubenda DPO Newsletter: Global Data Protection & Privacy News (issue #153) Why your consent management setup is a marketing performance question Everything you need to know about GDPR The redesigned cookie banner and configurator What nobody tells you about handing over the company you built European marketers are betting on retention. Privacy could be the edge they’re not using yet. The 5 best alternatives to Didomi in 2026: Pros, cons, pricing, and comparison Looking back on 15 years: what iubenda's founder would tell his 2011 self | iubenda The best cookie policy generator in 2026 DPO Newsletter: Global Data Protection & Privacy News (issue #152) | iubenda What publishers should expect from the EU’s Digital Omnibus proposal Uncertainty is the biggest blocker to AI adoption in marketing | iubenda Everything AI app builders need to know about vibecoding and privacy compliance | iubenda Introducing 1-Click Embedding for Google Tag Manager The Essential Small Business Terms and Conditions Template: What You Need to Know Terms of Use Template | iubenda IAB Europe Raises Concerns Over GDPR Procedural Regulation Draft Report | iubenda Learn from HelloFresh's Costly Mistake: Ensure Compliance with iubenda | iubenda Understanding the Spanish DPA Guide on Audience Measurement Cookies | iubenda The Austrian Data Protection Authority's FAQs on Cookies and Privacy | iubenda DPO Newsletter: Global Data Protection & Privacy News (issue #127) | iubenda Microsoft Ensuring European Data Stays Within the EU Cloud Boundary | iubenda Businesses Beware: ICO’s Record £14.3m in Fines for Data Misuse in 2023 Understanding the Risks and Responsibilities of Model-as-a-Service Companies in AI Development Facebook's New “Link History” Feature: A Blend of Convenience and Surveillance? | iubenda OpenAI’s Strategic Move in the EU: Aligning with Data Privacy Regulations
Snapchat Lawsuit in Illinois Leads to $35 Million Settlem...
Jessica Ryder · 2022-08-31 · via Compliance Solutions for Websites, Apps and Organizations | iubenda

Snapchat Lawsuit: Users in Illinois Could Receive Compensation for Using Snapchat Filters and Lenses

In a landmark case concerning user privacy and biometric data, a recent Snapchat lawsuit in Illinois has culminated in a $35 million settlement. Illinois residents who used Snapchat’s filters and lenses might be eligible for financial compensation. This development comes as a significant chapter in the ongoing debate over digital privacy rights.

Snapchat lawsuit

Understanding the Snapchat Lawsuit and Biometric Privacy

The crux of the Snapchat lawsuit revolves around how the social media giant collected and utilized users’ biometric data through its popular filters and lenses. This practice was deemed a violation of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) – one of the nation’s strictest laws in the realm of biometric data regulation. BIPA strictly controls how businesses handle biometric information like fingerprints, eye scans, and facial recognition data. The law mandates that companies must provide clear written disclosure about the purpose and duration of data storage when gathering such sensitive information.

Snapchat’s Stance and Illinois’ Rigorous Privacy Laws

Despite the settlement, Snapchat has contested any wrongdoing. Pete Boogaard, a Snapchat spokesperson, emphasized that their lenses do not engage in facial recognition nor collect biometric data that could identify individuals. Boogaard added that the data utilized by Snapchat’s lenses is stored on the user’s device and is not transmitted to Snapchat’s servers. However, to showcase their commitment to user privacy and as a precaution, Snapchat introduced an in-app consent notice for Illinois users earlier this year.

Snapchat lawsuit in Illinois: the Battle for Biometric Privacy

This Snapchat lawsuit is not an isolated event in Illinois. The state has seen similar legal battles, with major companies facing lawsuits over biometric data misuse. Recently, a judge approved a $92 million settlement in a case against TikTok for violating Illinois law. Additionally, Meta settled for $37.5 million over allegations of tracking users’ locations without consent in California.

Eligibility and Claim Submission

Illinois residents who utilized Snapchat’s filters and lenses between November 17, 2015, and the present might be entitled to a share of the settlement, which is expected to range between $58 and $117 per person. Those eligible must submit their claims by September 24th to be considered.