惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - Franky
The Cloudflare Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
小众软件
小众软件
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
月光博客
月光博客
B
Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
V
V2EX
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园 - 司徒正美
IT之家
IT之家
G
Google Developers Blog
C
Check Point Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
GbyAI
GbyAI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻

Compliance Solutions for Websites, Apps and Organizations | iubenda

AI can build your website. It can't manage your consent. | iubenda Browser signals and machine-readable consent: what they are and what the EU’s Digital Omnibus could change California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): Complete Guide How to increase your cookie banner opt-in rates: 5 mistakes to fix today | iubenda DPO Newsletter: Global Data Protection & Privacy News (issue #153) Why your consent management setup is a marketing performance question Everything you need to know about GDPR The redesigned cookie banner and configurator What nobody tells you about handing over the company you built European marketers are betting on retention. Privacy could be the edge they’re not using yet. The 5 best alternatives to Didomi in 2026: Pros, cons, pricing, and comparison Looking back on 15 years: what iubenda's founder would tell his 2011 self | iubenda The best cookie policy generator in 2026 DPO Newsletter: Global Data Protection & Privacy News (issue #152) | iubenda What publishers should expect from the EU’s Digital Omnibus proposal Uncertainty is the biggest blocker to AI adoption in marketing | iubenda Everything AI app builders need to know about vibecoding and privacy compliance | iubenda Introducing 1-Click Embedding for Google Tag Manager The Essential Small Business Terms and Conditions Template: What You Need to Know Terms of Use Template | iubenda IAB Europe Raises Concerns Over GDPR Procedural Regulation Draft Report | iubenda Learn from HelloFresh's Costly Mistake: Ensure Compliance with iubenda | iubenda Understanding the Spanish DPA Guide on Audience Measurement Cookies | iubenda The Austrian Data Protection Authority's FAQs on Cookies and Privacy | iubenda DPO Newsletter: Global Data Protection & Privacy News (issue #127) | iubenda Microsoft Ensuring European Data Stays Within the EU Cloud Boundary | iubenda Businesses Beware: ICO’s Record £14.3m in Fines for Data Misuse in 2023 Understanding the Risks and Responsibilities of Model-as-a-Service Companies in AI Development Facebook's New “Link History” Feature: A Blend of Convenience and Surveillance? | iubenda OpenAI’s Strategic Move in the EU: Aligning with Data Privacy Regulations
Understanding Google's $93m Settlement over Consumer Loca...
Jessica Ryder · 2023-09-29 · via Compliance Solutions for Websites, Apps and Organizations | iubenda

Google has recently concluded a significant settlement, agreeing to pay $93 million to resolve allegations claiming that the company misled consumers regarding the tracking and storage of their location information.

This settlement is the result of an extensive investigation into Google’s data practices and follows a lawsuit initiated by California Attorney General, Rob Bonta.

Background of the Case:

The lawsuit asserted that Google presented consumers with misleading information, giving them the impression they had more control over their location data than they actually possessed. This discrepancy between what was communicated to the users and the alleged reality forms the core of the complaint.

“Our investigation disclosed a considerable divergence between Google’s assurances to users – that opting out meant their location would no longer be tracked – and the actual practices of continuing to monitor user movements for commercial benefits,” declared Attorney General Bonta, emphasizing the importance of holding Google accountable for such divergences.

Core Discrepancies:

Users were given the option to disable their “location history,” with Google stating explicitly that it would cease to track the locations of those who opted for this. However, it was alleged that the company still continued to gather and store users’ location data through other means, including “web and app activity” trackers, which are typically enabled by default.

Google, additionally, was accused of concealing the true extent of users’ ability to avoid targeted advertisements based on their location, contributing to the overall allegation of deception and misrepresentation.

Terms of the Settlement:

While Google hasn’t admitted to any wrongdoing in the settlement, it has consented to comply with several terms besides the monetary payout. The company has committed to enhancing transparency around its location tracking activities, alerting users before using location data to create ad profiles, and obtaining approvals from its internal privacy working group prior to implementing substantial privacy-related changes.

José Castañeda, a spokesperson for Google, clarified, “Aligned with the enhancements we’ve incorporated in recent years, we’ve resolved this matter, attributed to obsolete product policies that have already undergone modifications.”

Past Settlements:

This isn’t a solitary incident of such settlements for Google. The company settled a comparable lawsuit in 2022, wherein it was accused of analogous deceptive location privacy practices by attorneys general from 40 states, and agreed to pay nearly $392 million.

This case underscores the crucial need for transparency and clarity in the way companies, especially tech giants like Google, manage and communicate their data practices to consumers. With growing concerns over data privacy and security, it’s imperative that companies are held to stringent standards to maintain user trust and ensure the responsible use of sensitive information. This settlement serves as a reminder and a precedent, emphasizing responsibility and accountability in handling user data.