惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
GbyAI
GbyAI
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
月光博客
月光博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
腾讯CDC
博客园 - Franky
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
C
Check Point Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
I
InfoQ
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
P
Proofpoint News Feed
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
WordPress大学
WordPress大学

Daniel Duque Campayo

Cursos de música online Latex, Beamer, Python, Beauty Boring stuff Prueba Tired of that “TeX” look? Plotting 2D column-shaped results with python Grabaciones al aire libre A markdown test Quick von Neumann stability analysis
Better with stock pictures
2018-10-29 · via Daniel Duque Campayo

The previous equation is still too general, and a connection between stress and strain is still needed. Here we consider the case in which there is a linear relationship between both, which involves the coefficient of viscosity.

To begin with, let us consider a simple case in which a fluid is confined between two planes. One of them moves sideways with a certain speed u_0, while the other is kept fixed. After a certain transient, some force is needed in order to keep this shearing. The simplest expression is

F= \mu A \frac{u_0}{L}.

The force is proportional to the area and to the velocity difference between the planes. It is also inversely proportional to their separation, L (this fact being the least obvious). Finally, a constant of proportionality is given by \mu, the viscosity coefficient, or

simply  “the viscosity”. This constant may vary with temperature, density, pressure, but the point with Newtonian fluids is that it does not vary with the velocity field (or its derivatives).

Later, in section …, this flow will be solved as a solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, the Couette flow. There, it will be shown that the velocity is everywhere in the direction of the force exerted on the upper plane, let us call it $x$, and varies linearly between the planes, in the y direction. Therefore, the only components of the strain rate tensor are \epsilon_{xy} = \epsilon_{yx} = u_0 / ( 2 L ). We therefore have

\tau_{xy} = \mu \epsilon_{xy}.

With this in mind, let us look for a general relationship between \tau and $latex

\epsilon$. This is much easier if we go to the principal strain axes. These are the coordinates on which the strain rate is diagonal. Such coordinate system always exist, since the strain rate tensor is symmetric. Notice that in these system strains are not due to shear, only to dilations.