惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

C
Cisco Blogs
The Cloudflare Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
U
Unit 42
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
C
Check Point Blog
Security Latest
Security Latest
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
J
Java Code Geeks
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
F
Full Disclosure
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
雷峰网
雷峰网
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
V
V2EX
Latest news
Latest news
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
A
About on SuperTechFans
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
A
Arctic Wolf
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
腾讯CDC
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
罗磊的独立博客
S
Schneier on Security
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
博客园 - 司徒正美
K
Kaspersky official blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
月光博客
月光博客
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Project Zero
Project Zero
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
I
InfoQ

seangoedecke.com RSS feed

LLMs reward expertise Powerful AIs might escape containment by releasing themselves as open-weight models Impro is a handbook for running a cult Overtraining as the path to human-like AI What does "playing politics" mean for software engineers? In defense of not understanding your codebase Blog about things you don't understand yet C2PA only works if everything is signed Text AI watermarks will always be trivial to remove Saying the obvious thing AI inference is obviously profitable AI GPUs probably live longer than three years Doing nothing at work Working with product managers Anti-AI nostalgia and the cult of the past Weird projects I shipped with AI Build agents, not pipelines The famous o3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work Prompts are technical debt too The just-say-no engineer was a ZIRP phenomenon How I use LLMs as a staff engineer in 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Flash means LLM steering is interesting again Thinking Machines and interaction models The left-wing case for AI AI makes weak engineers less harmful Notes on incidents Why hasn't longer-horizon training slowed AI progress? Why I don't like the "staff engineer archetypes" Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career Blood in the datacenter Many anti-AI arguments are conservative arguments Programming (with AI agents) as theory building Working on products people hate Engineers do get promoted for writing simple code Big tech engineers need big egos I don't know if my job will still exist in ten years Giving LLMs a personality is just good engineering What's so hard about continuous learning? Insider amnesia LLM-generated skills work, if you generate them afterwards Two different tricks for fast LLM inference On screwing up Large tech companies don't need heroes Getting the main thing right How does AI impact skill formation? You have to know how to drive the car
AI datacenters in space do not have a cooling problem
2026-05-13 · via seangoedecke.com RSS feed

This year Elon Musk has started banging the drum about building AI datacenters in space. As the only person who owns a successful space company and a (moderately) successful AI company, this is a sensible way to boost his profile and net worth. Is it a sensible way to build datacenters?

The cooling problem

The first comment underneath most discussions of this always goes along these lines: “you obviously can’t build AI datacenters in space, because heat dissipation is really hard in space, and AI datacenters generate a lot of heat”.

In general I am distrustful of snappy answers like these. It reminds me of the “AI datacenters obviously don’t use a lot of water, because cooling fluid circulates in a closed-loop system” argument: if it were true, there wouldn’t be a debate at all, just one side who understand the obvious point and another side who are stupid.

Some arguments are like this! However, more often there’s a complicating factor that makes the snappy answer incorrect. In the water-use case, it’s that the closed-loop system has to itself be cooled by an open-loop evaporative chiller. What about the space datacenter case?

Why cooling is possible in space

First, let’s give the argument a fair shake. Although space is itself very cold, cooling is tricky because everything you’d want to cool is surrounded by vacuum. Heat transfer works in three ways:

  1. Hot (i.e. fast-moving) atoms bump into other atoms, making them move and thus heating them up
  2. Hot atoms physically move from one location to another (e.g. in a fluid or gas), staying hot and thus making their new location hotter
  3. Hot objects emit photons (electromagnetic radiation), cooling themselves down and heating up other objects those photons collide with

Vacuum is an excellent insulator because it defeats the first two methods of heat transfer. If there are no (or very few) atoms surrounding an object, those atoms can’t move around or collide. That’s why vacuum is used as an insulator in thermoses, travel mugs, and so on.

So how can space datacenters get rid of their heat? By doubling down on the third method of heat transfer. Although it’s much harder to do heat transfer via moving atoms around in space, it’s actually easier to do heat transfer via emitting radiation. Any good emitter is also a good absorber. A perfectly black object is the most efficient emitter, but it’s also the most efficient way to absorb photons from external sources, which is why black objects get hotter in the sun1. In space, the sun’s light is much easier to avoid, because there aren’t objects everywhere for it to bounce off. A shaded radiator can dump quite a lot of heat.

Why cooling is still going to be hard

It would still require putting more radiators in space than we’ve ever done before. There are plenty of writeups out there if you want to read through the numbers. This is a recent one that estimates ~2500 square metres of radiation area would be needed to serve 1MW of datacenter energy (much less than what it’d need in solar panels)2. A serious AI datacenter is around 100MW3, so we’d need 250,000 square metres of radiation area. The largest current radiator in space is probably the ISS, at around a thousand square metres.

Is scaling that up by 250x a lot? Yes, but it’s not necessarily ridiculous. We currently have zero industrial operations happening in space, so there’s been no need to push the boundaries here. In the grand scheme of things, 250,000 square metres is not that big. By my very rough estimates, that’s between 100-500 Starship launches: a couple of years at SpaceX’s current launch cadence, or a few months at their (very optimistic) estimate of future launch cadence.

Conclusion

Of course, you don’t just need radiators to put a datacenter in space. You need a similar quantity of solar panels, the GPUs themselves, and all kinds of other supporting equipment. If a GPU dies in an Earth datacenter, you can go in and swap it out; if it dies in space, you just have to leave it dead and keep going with less capacity.

It’s still wildly impractical to build AI datacenters in space. But it’s not impossible, and it’s certainly not impossible because of the cooling, which is a relatively minor component of the total mass that would have to be launched into space.


If you liked this post, consider subscribing to email updates about my new posts, or sharing it on Hacker News.

Here's a preview of a related post that shares tags with this one.

Thinking Machines and interaction models

Thinking Machines just released Interaction Models. This is their first real AI model release after a year of work and two billion dollars of capital. What is an “interaction model”? First, it’s not a frontier model. Thinking Machines is not yet competing with OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.

Instead, they’re working on the problem of better real-time interaction with models. Some parts of what they’re doing are not new at all, other parts are slightly-questionable benchmark gaming, and still other parts represent a genuine technological advancement. I’ll try to lay it all out.
Continue reading...