惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
IT之家
IT之家
C
Check Point Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
美团技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Jina AI
Jina AI
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
V
Visual Studio Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
The Cloudflare Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
SMOOTH: A Framework for Turning AI from Interesting to Us...
rcshubhadeep · 2026-06-15 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

Most conversations about AI start with prompts. How do I write a better prompt? What model should I use? Should I use ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or something else?

These questions matter, but they often distract from the bigger issue. The quality of AI outputs is usually determined long before a prompt is written.

The real challenge is not prompting. The real challenge is defining work in a way that can be executed reliably.

After helping teams experiment with AI, redesign workflows, and build production AI systems, I have noticed a recurring pattern. When AI fails, it is rarely because the model is incapable. More often, it is because the task itself is poorly structured.

Humans are surprisingly good at filling in gaps. AI is not. Humans can infer context, identify unstated assumptions, and ask clarifying questions. AI systems work best when expectations, constraints, and objectives are made explicit.

This led me to develop a simple framework that helps individuals and teams move from vague intent to reliable AI-assisted execution. I call it SMOOTH.

The Problem with Most AI Usage

A typical interaction with AI often looks like this:

Help me create a go-to-market strategy.
Analyze this meeting transcript.
Tell me what actions I should take.

These requests seem reasonable, but they leave critical questions unanswered: What business context exists? What outcome is expected? What constraints should be respected? What evidence should be used? How should success be measured?

When these things are left undefined, AI fills in the gaps. Sometimes it fills them in correctly. Sometimes it does not. The result is inconsistency.

SMOOTH is designed to reduce that inconsistency.

S

Signal

Separate signal from noise.

Before asking AI to do anything, identify the information that truly matters. People often provide either too little context or too much irrelevant context. Both create problems.

Noise includes unrelated background information, assumptions that have not been validated, and details that do not affect the decision.

What information would a competent professional absolutely need to complete this task?

Everything else can usually be removed.

Useful inputs

  • Relevant business context
  • Important constraints
  • Available evidence
  • Desired outcome

M

Mental Model

Treat AI as a capable but inexperienced collaborator.

Many people assume AI knows what they mean. In reality, AI only knows what has been communicated.

Imagine assigning work to a new team member. You would explain why the task matters, what success looks like, what constraints exist, and what examples should be followed. The same principle applies here.

A clear mental model creates alignment between the user and the system. Without it, AI often produces technically correct but practically useless outputs.

The goal is not simply to tell AI what to do. The goal is to help AI understand the context in which the work exists.

Useful inputs

  • Why the task matters
  • What success looks like
  • What constraints exist
  • What examples should be followed

O

Objective

Define an outcome that can be evaluated.

One of the most common mistakes in AI usage is asking open-ended questions when a concrete outcome is required.

Tell me about our customer success challenges.
Identify the three highest-risk churn factors from the transcript and provide one recommended action for each.

The second request creates a measurable objective. The more objective the task, the more reliable the outcome.

Useful inputs

  • What should be produced?
  • How will it be evaluated?
  • What does success look like?

O

Observability

Make the process visible.

Most users only see the final answer. This makes it difficult to understand where errors originate. Instead, ask AI to expose its reasoning structure.

Observability allows you to inspect the work rather than simply consuming the result. This becomes increasingly important as tasks become more complex.

The more critical the decision, the more important it is to see how conclusions were reached.

Useful inputs

  • Listing assumptions
  • Showing intermediate outputs
  • Explaining decision criteria
  • Providing confidence levels

T

Traceability

Every conclusion should be connected to evidence.

Traceability is the difference between:

The customer is at risk.
The customer mentioned implementation delays three times, expressed concern about adoption rates, and indicated uncertainty about renewal timelines.

The first is an opinion. The second can be verified. If an output cannot be traced back to its supporting information, it becomes difficult to trust.

For organizations using AI in business processes, traceability is often more important than raw intelligence. Reliable systems are rarely the ones that generate the most impressive answers. They are the ones that can explain how those answers were produced.

Useful inputs

  • Sources
  • Evidence
  • Decision criteria
  • Explicit reasoning

H

Harnessability

Design workflows, not prompts.

This is where many AI initiatives succeed or fail. Most people think of AI as question to answer. Real work is rarely that simple.

Most business processes involve multiple stages: research, extraction, analysis, validation, and decision. Each stage has its own requirements.

Instead of relying on a single prompt, create a harness around the process. A harness ensures that outputs are reviewed before they move to the next stage. It introduces structure, consistency, and accountability.

This is how production AI systems are built. The same principle applies whether you are an individual using ChatGPT or a company deploying AI at scale.

Useful inputs

  • Inputs
  • Rules
  • Evaluation criteria
  • Quality checks

Putting It Together

SMOOTH is not a prompting framework. It is a work design framework. It helps transform vague human intent into reliable AI execution.

Signal

Mental Model

Objective

Observability

Traceability

Harnessability

Reliable Outcome

Each layer reduces ambiguity. Each layer increases reliability. Each layer makes AI more useful.

The Future of AI Adoption

The organizations that gain the most value from AI will not necessarily be the ones with access to the best models. They will be the ones that learn how to structure work effectively.

Models will continue to improve. Capabilities will continue to expand. But the need for clear objectives, observable processes, traceable decisions, and well-designed workflows will remain.

AI does not eliminate the need for thinking. It increases the value of structured thinking. That is what SMOOTH is designed to encourage.