




























Abstract:World models have emerged as a unifying paradigm for learning latent dynamics, simulating counterfactual futures, and supporting planning under uncertainty. In this paper, we argue that computational epidemiology is a natural and underdeveloped setting for world models. This is because epidemic decision-making requires reasoning about latent disease burden, imperfect and policy-dependent surveillance signals, and intervention effects are mediated by adaptive human behavior. We introduce a conceptual framework for epidemiological world models, formulating epidemics as controlled, partially observed dynamical systems in which (i) the true epidemic state is latent, (ii) observations are noisy and endogenous to policy, and (iii) interventions act as sequential actions whose effects propagate through behavioral and social feedback. We present three case studies that illustrate why explicit world modeling is necessary for policy-relevant reasoning: strategic misreporting in behavioral surveillance, systematic delays in time-lagged signals such as hospitalizations and deaths, and counterfactual intervention analysis where identical histories diverge under alternative action sequences.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2604.09519 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2604.09519v2 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09519 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
From: Yiqi Su [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:39:20 UTC (1,357 KB)
[v2]
Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:43:48 UTC (1,571 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。