Abstract:Hybrid mechanistic models, physical priors with learned residuals, promise to reduce the data required for good decisions, but have no computable criterion to test this. We characterize the value of mechanistic priors in sequential decision-making within both asymptotic and burn-in regimes. To formalize this, we introduce the mechanistic information of a model -- the mutual information between the model's recommended policy $\hat{\pi}$ and the true optimal policy $\pi^*$ -- quantified via an occupancy-weighted bias $B_\mu$. In the asymptotic regime (large $N$), matched bounds reveal that Bayesian regret scales with the residual entropy $H_{\mathrm{mech}}$, delivering a theoretical sample complexity reduction of $H(\mu)/H_{\mathrm{mech}}$ compared to an uninformed baseline. Furthermore, we provide a model certificate to determine empirical sample efficiency. Complementarily, in the clinically relevant burn-in regime (small $N$), we establish a lower bound on the penalty incurred by confidently wrong priors. We demonstrate both the asymptotic and burn-in bounds across 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing simulations motivated by published FOLFOX pharmacokinetic data, where a hybrid prior yields large sample-efficiency gains in the burn-in regime. Finally, we contrast these grounded models with LLM priors, demonstrating that LLMs can suffer severe losses in mechanistic information, thereby motivating the exclusive use of physically-grounded priors for safety-critical applications.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.10018 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.10018v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.10018 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
From: Itai Shufaro [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 11 May 2026 05:43:53 UTC (413 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。