Abstract:Fourier Neural Operators are often assumed to generalize across spatial resolutions, enabling training on a coarse grid and deployment on a finer grid. We test this assumption by contrasting two inference-time choices when moving from training resolution $s$ to test resolution $S>s$: running FNO directly at $S$, or running at $s$ and upsampling the prediction to $S$ via Fourier zero-padding. On Darcy flow, we observe that direct fine-grid inference is not reliably beneficial and can be worse than the low-grid-plus-upsampling baseline. We further analyze layerwise spectra and find that, under Fourier truncation, intermediate representations increasingly concentrate energy in low frequencies, with high-frequency output produced mainly by late nonlinear/decoder stages. This offers a mechanistic explanation for why FNO can perform well while retaining few modes, yet remain sensitive under resolution shifts. Our findings highlight a simple but strong baseline for cross-resolution evaluation and point to nonlinear aliasing as a key obstacle to zero-shot resolution equivariance.
From: Alex Colagrande [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 30 May 2026 11:28:17 UTC (461 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。