The detection of intrusions in IoT-based networks poses challenges that cannot be overcome using traditional machine learning methods. Perhaps the biggest of them is related to the presence of a class imbalance in the side-channel dataset, where the number of samples in the normal class compared to the attacks can reach a ratio of 75,964 to 1. Such an aspect is addressed by Dominguez et al. through the proof of concept of power-based intrusion detection. Unfortunately, neither the authors attempt to cope with the problem of imbalance nor do they assess the classifier performance using a balanced training set. In the current paper, both aspects will be handled at once. First, a Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was performed on all nine possible datasets extracted from the initial one, providing an exact imbalance ratio of 1.1 for each. Then, eight algorithms i.e. Random Forest, HistGradientBoosting, LightGBM, Extra Trees, XGBoost, k-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Decision Tree were trained under identical conditions for the SMOTE balanced 6-hour dataset. Random Forest reached a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.9989 and macro F1 of 0.9794, thus outperforming the previously best micro-F1 result obtained by Time Series Forest algorithm from the base paper of 0.9983. Extra Trees provided the same performance as well, but at 10 times faster. The introduction of a macro-F1 metric explicitly in contrast to the base paper assessment reveals important class-level information missed with aggregate performance metrics. Recall rates per-class calculated with confusion matrices, F1 heatmaps, and ROC curves show that minority attack classes, especially those with combined M+L infections, are detected reliably only when using SMOTE balance. Feature importance analysis indicates the latest time steps as the most important predictor signals out of 60 steps in a power window.